CSC study materials
CSC study resources

CSC (AACN): Retirement Income and a Concentrated Portfolio

CSC · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Retirement Income and a Concentrated Portfolio

A couple, aged 62 and 60, plan to retire in three years. They have $1.2 million invested: $700,000 in RRSPs, $300,000 in TFSAs, and $200,000 in a taxable account. Their defined-benefit pension will pay $55,000 a year starting at 65, and estimated CPP and OAS will add $28,000 combined at 65. They want $95,000 a year before tax, indexed at 2.5%. Their current portfolio is 80% equities-55% of the total is concentrated in five Canadian bank and energy stocks-15% cash, and 5% bonds. Their risk questionnaire says 'moderate,' but they sold most equities in the 2022 decline. They have no mortgage and a $30,000 emergency fund.

1. Calculate the portfolio withdrawal needed before and after age 65 and the required return. Is the current allocation consistent with their capacity and willingness to take risk?

Read the worked answer

Before age 65: No pension or CPP/OAS yet. The portfolio must fund the full $95,000 a year for three years: $95,000 × 3 = $285,000 That is about 23.8% of the $1.2 million portfolio and must be available in the near term.

After age 65: Pension $55,000 + CPP/OAS $28,000 = $83,000 Portfolio withdrawal needed = $95,000 − $83,000 = $12,000, indexed at 2.5%. On $1.2 million, that is an initial withdrawal rate of 1.0%.

Required return: After 65, the portfolio needs to cover only a small gap plus inflation and fees. A return of roughly inflation plus fees, or about 3% to 4% nominal, is sufficient over time. Before 65, the need is liquidity, not high return; the $285,000 bridge should be in short-term bonds, GICs, or cash equivalents.

Capacity versus willingness: Capacity is high because the DB pension covers most essential spending and the portfolio withdrawal rate is low. Willingness is low: they sold equities in 2022 and describe themselves as moderate. An 80% equity allocation is inconsistent with their demonstrated behaviour and with the three-year bridge. The 55% concentration in five bank and energy stocks adds uncompensated risk. A moderate allocation is appropriate, but not 80% equities.

2. Recommend a target asset allocation and risk controls, including how to reduce the concentrated stock position tax-efficiently.

Read the worked answer

Target allocation:

  • 50% to 55% equities, globally diversified, with no more than 5% in any single stock and no more than 15% in any one sector.
  • 35% to 40% fixed income, including a GIC ladder or short-term government bonds for the bridge period.
  • 5% to 10% cash and short-term reserves, enough to cover at least two years of withdrawals.

Bridge fund: Carve out $285,000 for the three years before pension and CPP/OAS begin. Hold it in a GIC ladder maturing annually or in short-term government bonds. Do not expose the down-payment-equivalent money to equity risk.

Reducing concentration:

  • Sell the concentrated stocks inside the RRSP and TFSA first. Those accounts do not trigger immediate capital gains tax on sales, so diversification can begin there at low tax cost.
  • In the taxable account, spread sales over two tax years if capital gains would push them into a higher bracket. Use available capital losses to offset gains.
  • If the couple makes charitable gifts, consider donating shares in kind rather than selling first, subject to tax advice.
  • Reinvest proceeds into a diversified portfolio and set a written rule that no single stock may exceed 5% after rebalancing.

Risk controls: Rebalance with 5% bands, review the IPS annually, and keep the $30,000 emergency fund separate from the retirement portfolio.

3. What behavioral and sequencing risks should the IPS address, and what specific rules would you write?

Read the worked answer

Behavioral risks:

  • Recency bias: the 2022 decline is still fresh, so the couple may be tempted to sell equities after a drop.
  • Loss aversion: they may focus on short-term losses rather than long-term income.
  • Home bias and familiarity: the bank and energy concentration feels safe because the names are familiar, but it is undiversified.
  • Anchoring: they may anchor to the portfolio's past value or to the dividend income from the concentrated stocks.

Sequencing risk: Retiring into a weak market while withdrawing from equities can permanently impair the portfolio. The three-year bridge and a cash reserve reduce the need to sell equities in a downturn.

Specific IPS rules:

  1. Hold two years of planned withdrawals in cash or short-term bonds.
  2. Rebalance to target weights when any major asset class moves more than 5 percentage points from target.
  3. No single stock may exceed 5% of the portfolio; no single sector may exceed 15%.
  4. Withdraw from cash and bonds first in a down equity market; do not sell equities to fund spending after a decline of more than 10% until the cash reserve is used.
  5. Review the plan annually, but do not change the target allocation in response to short-term market moves without a documented discussion.
  6. Pre-commit to a withdrawal rate and inflation adjustment, and revisit only if the funded ratio changes materially.