The Overloaded Team Project
You are one of four students on a semester-long group project worth 30% of your grade. Two members, Ana and Kwame, have done most of the work; one member, Jordan, has missed four of six meetings and submitted low-quality drafts. The final presentation is in five days. Ana wants to email the professor to say Jordan did almost nothing and ask that Jordan be graded separately. Kwame says that's 'snitching' and wants to just fix Jordan's sections quietly. Jordan has told you privately that a family situation has made this semester hard but asked you not to tell anyone. You are the one Jordan confided in.
1. How do you handle the situation with Ana, Kwame, and Jordan?
Read the worked answer
This involves competing loyalties (to Jordan's confidence, to the team's fairness, to the professor's need for accurate information) and proportionality.
- Jordan's confidence deserves respect, but it doesn't obligate you to absorb the consequences silently or to lie.
- Ana's concern is legitimate: unequal contribution affects grades. 'Snitching' framing is unhelpful-accountability isn't betrayal.
- Quietly fixing Jordan's work hides the problem and rewards non-contribution.
A good path: talk to Jordan first, privately, and ask what they're comfortable sharing and whether they want to tell the professor themselves or request an extension/accommodation. Encourage Jordan to disclose at least the fact that they've been struggling, without you revealing the details. Then bring the team together to agree on a fair plan (redistribute work, document contributions) and, if Jordan won't engage, support Ana in raising it factually rather than as an accusation.
Grading looks for: honoring the confidence without becoming complicit in concealment, protecting fairness, and preferring direct conversation over either silent fixing or immediate escalation.
2. Jordan says, 'Please don't tell anyone-if the professor knows, I'll fail.' What do you do?
Read the worked answer
You can keep the specific details confidential while still being honest about the work situation.
- You are not obligated to reveal a private family matter, and doing so could harm Jordan.
- But you also can't promise to conceal the contribution problem-that affects everyone's grade and the professor's ability to be fair.
So: tell Jordan you won't share the personal details, but that the team can't pretend the work was equal, and that the best protection is for Jordan to talk to the professor (who may offer accommodations). Offer to go with them or to help draft the message. If Jordan refuses and the deadline passes with no change, the honest move is to let the professor know the facts about contributions without speculating about causes.
Grading looks for: distinguishing confidential details from relevant facts, refusing false promises, and steering toward Jordan's own disclosure.
3. Ana drafts an email calling Jordan 'lazy and unreliable.' She asks you to co-sign. Do you?
Read the worked answer
Don't co-sign as written, but don't abandon Ana either.
- 'Lazy and unreliable' is character judgment, not fact, and could be unfair given what you know.
- Co-signing would make you endorse a framing you don't believe and could expose you to being seen as having withheld relevant context.
A good response: propose a factual revision-dates missed, drafts submitted, work completed by each member-and offer to sign that. This protects fairness to Jordan, gives the professor what they actually need to make a grading decision, and keeps you honest with Ana about why you're changing it.
Grading looks for: refusing to endorse unfair characterizations, redirecting to factual documentation, and staying collaborative rather than self-righteous.