CEDC study materials
CEDC study resources

Fracture Care: Closed Treatment, Splinting, and the Global Package

CEDC · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Fracture Care: Closed Treatment, Splinting, and the Global Package

A 22-year-old cyclist falls and presents with a distal radius fracture and a nondisplaced fifth metacarpal neck fracture, both on the right side. The ED physician performs closed reduction of the distal radius under hematoma block, applies a short arm cast, and applies a volar splint to the metacarpal. The physician documents the reduction, the cast, the splint, and the post-reduction neurovascular exam. The patient is referred to orthopedics in 5 days. The ED physician does not plan to provide the follow-up care.

1. Select the fracture-care codes and determine whether the cast and splint are separately billable.

Read the worked answer

Step 1 - Fracture treatment codes.

  • Distal radius, closed treatment with manipulation: 25605 (closed treatment of distal radial fracture with manipulation). This is a global fracture-care code that includes the reduction, the application of the initial cast/splint, and routine follow-up within the global period.
  • Fifth metacarpal neck, closed treatment without manipulation: 26615 (closed treatment of metacarpal fracture, without manipulation, each).

Step 2 - Cast and splint. Because 25605 is a global fracture-care code, the initial cast application is included in 25605 and is not separately billable. The volar splint applied for the metacarpal is also part of the fracture treatment for that bone (26615 includes the initial immobilization). Therefore, do not bill 29075 (short arm cast) or 29125 (volar splint) separately - they are bundled into the fracture-care codes.

Step 3 - Multiple fractures. Two fractures in different bones are separately reportable. Rank by complexity: 25605 first at full value, 26615-59 for the second distinct fracture.

Result: 25605 + 26615-59. No separate cast/splint codes.

2. The patient returns to the same ED 5 days later because the cast is too tight, and a different ED physician removes the cast and applies a new short arm cast. How should that second visit be coded, and does the global period matter?

Read the worked answer

Global period analysis. 25605 carries a 90-day global period. The initial cast application (day 0) is included. A cast change during the global period is generally included in the global fracture care if it is routine and related to the same fracture - but a cast change for a complication (too tight, causing neurovascular compromise) may be separately reportable if the payer's rules allow and the service is distinct.

Practical coding.

  • The cast removal is typically not separately billable (it is part of the global package).
  • The new short arm cast (29075) may be billed with modifier -58 (staged/related procedure during the postoperative period) if the payer treats the recast as a distinct, separately identifiable service. Some payers bundle it into the global period; documentation of the complication (tight cast, neurovascular compromise) supports medical necessity.
  • If the payer bundles, do not bill 29075; document the complication for audit defense.

Result: Bill 29075-58 only if the payer permits separate payment for a complication-related recast; otherwise, no separate charge. The global period of 25605 governs the decision, and the second ED physician's E/M is generally not separately billable for the cast change alone unless a significant, separately identifiable E/M is documented (then -25).