PEG Feeding, Family Conflict, and Goals of Care in Advanced Illness
A 91-year-old woman with severe COPD (FEV1 30%), moderate dementia, and recent aspiration pneumonia has had two ICU admissions in 6 months. She has dysphagia, an 8-lb weight loss, and a sacral blister. Her family asks about a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Her living will says 'no heroic measures,' but she has no health care proxy. Her daughter wants 'everything'; her son says 'she would not want a tube.' She is alert but forgetful; she can state she wants to go home. She is on 2 L of oxygen.
1. How would you assess her decision-making capacity and use her stated wishes and living will to guide the PEG decision?
Read the worked answer
I would assess whether she can understand the PEG, alternatives such as hand feeding, the likely benefits and burdens, and the consequence of saying yes or no; whether she can appreciate how this applies to her; whether she can reason; and whether she can express a consistent choice. Her ability to say she wants to go home does not prove capacity for a complex tube-feeding decision, but her prior values matter. The living will's 'no heroic measures' is not specific enough to settle tube feeding, so I would use substituted judgment: what would she choose given her severe COPD, dementia, and aspiration? In advanced dementia, PEG does not improve survival or quality of life and may increase aspiration and restraint use. I would offer hand feeding and palliative care, and involve ethics if conflict persists.
2. What palliative interventions and hospice criteria should be considered?
Read the worked answer
Address dyspnea with low-dose opioids, oxygen if hypoxemic, fans, positioning, and anxiety treatment; treat pain, constipation, and secretions. Discuss hand feeding, oral care, and avoiding burdensome hospital transfers. She may qualify for hospice under COPD criteria (FEV1 <30%, dyspnea at rest, recurrent hospitalizations, weight loss, cor pulmonale) or dementia criteria (stage 7, aspiration, weight loss, recurrent infection). Hospice is not 'giving up'; it provides symptom management and family support. If she improves, eligibility can be reassessed. The goal is comfort and alignment with her values, not a fixed rule.
3. How would you run a family meeting to resolve the conflict?
Read the worked answer
Prepare by reviewing the chart, inviting the key people, and arranging a quiet space and interpreter if needed. Ask each person what they understand and what they fear; explore the daughter's 'everything' and the son's 'no tube' as expressions of love and loyalty. Share the clinical trajectory in plain language, including what PEG can and cannot do. Summarize the values you hear, make a recommendation grounded in those values, and allow silence and questions. Document the discussion, the decision, and who has authority. If consensus is impossible, use ethics consultation and, if necessary, a court-appointed decision-maker. Follow up to support grieving and avoid abandonment.