The Painful Shoulder After a Previous Rotator Cuff Repair
A 58-year-old recreational tennis player had an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair 18 months ago for a full-thickness supraspinatus tear. He now reports night pain and weakness lifting overhead, and he has stopped playing tennis. Examination shows a positive Jobe test, painful arc above 90 degrees, and active forward elevation of 120 degrees with passive elevation of 160 degrees. Radiographs show a high-riding humeral head with an acromiohumeral distance of 5 mm and no advanced glenohumeral arthritis. MRI shows a retracted re-tear of the supraspinatus with 2 cm of retraction, Goutallier grade 3 fatty infiltration, and an intact subscapularis.
1. How do the imaging findings and his functional goals influence whether revision repair, tendon transfer, or arthroplasty is the best option?
Read the worked answer
Key findings: re-tear with 2 cm retraction, Goutallier grade 3 fatty infiltration, high-riding head with acromiohumeral distance of 5 mm (suggesting chronicity and possible superior migration), preserved joint space, and an intact subscapularis. He is a recreational athlete who wants to return to tennis.
Options:
- Revision repair - feasible if the tendon is mobile and can be brought to the footprint. Goutallier grade 3 and 2 cm retraction reduce the likelihood of durable healing; repair may still improve pain and function but has a higher failure rate.
- Tendon transfer (e.g., lower trapezius or latissimus transfer for posterosuperior deficiency) - considered for irreparable tears with preserved joint and intact subscapularis, especially in younger, active patients. It can restore external rotation and elevation but has a learning curve and variable outcomes.
- Reverse shoulder arthroplasty - reliable for pain and function in older, lower-demand patients with cuff tear arthropathy; less attractive in a 58-year-old active tennis player because of activity restrictions and implant longevity concerns.
The judgment call: with preserved joint space, an intact subscapularis, and high functional goals, a biologic reconstruction (repair if mobile, transfer if irreparable) is preferable to arthroplasty, with realistic counseling about failure risk given fatty infiltration.
2. What intraoperative findings would determine whether you proceed with repair versus transfer, and how do you counsel him about return to tennis?
Read the worked answer
Intraoperative assessment:
- Tendon mobility: if the tendon can be mobilized to the footprint without excessive tension, revision repair with a robust construct is reasonable.
- Tissue quality: poor, friable tendon favors transfer or augmentation.
- Fatty infiltration and atrophy: advanced changes predict poor healing; consider transfer.
- Subscapularis integrity: an intact subscapularis is a prerequisite for posterosuperior transfer options.
- Glenohumeral cartilage: advanced arthritis would push toward arthroplasty.
Counseling: revision surgery is not guaranteed to restore overhead tennis. Recovery involves a sling and protected rehabilitation for weeks, with strengthening over months. Return to recreational tennis is possible but may take 6–12 months and may be at a lower level; some patients do not return to overhead sports. Discuss the risk of re-tear, stiffness, and the possibility of further surgery. Document that he understands the uncertainty.