Supervisee Competence and Gatekeeping
Dr. Lee is a licensed counseling psychologist supervising a third-year doctoral trainee, Jordan, at a university counseling center. Over the past two months, Dr. Lee has noticed that Jordan consistently arrives late to supervision, misses deadlines for case notes, and has twice failed to complete required risk assessments for clients with suicidal ideation. When given feedback, Jordan becomes defensive and blames the center's “disorganized system.” Jordan's clients have not yet reported harm, but Dr. Lee is concerned about Jordan's professionalism and client safety. The training director asks Dr. Lee to provide a formal evaluation of Jordan's progress. Dr. Lee must decide how to handle the evaluation and whether to recommend remediation or dismissal from the program.
1. What are Dr. Lee's ethical responsibilities regarding the evaluation of Jordan's performance?
Read the worked answer
Dr. Lee must balance the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and integrity. According to APA Ethical Standard 7.06 (Assessing Student and Supervisee Performance), Dr. Lee must establish a timely and specific process for providing feedback and must evaluate supervisees based on their actual performance on relevant and established program requirements. Dr. Lee should document specific instances of late arrivals, missed deadlines, and incomplete risk assessments, and discuss these with Jordan in supervision. If remediation is needed, Dr. Lee should develop a written remediation plan with clear objectives and timelines, and involve the training director as appropriate. Dr. Lee also has a gatekeeping responsibility to protect clients and the public (APA Standard 2.05, Delegation of Work to Others) and must ensure that Jordan does not perform duties beyond their competence. If Jordan's behavior poses a risk to clients, Dr. Lee must take immediate action, such as increased supervision or limiting Jordan's caseload, and may need to recommend dismissal if remediation fails.
2. How should Dr. Lee address Jordan's defensiveness and the potential impact on the supervisory relationship?
Read the worked answer
Dr. Lee should approach the situation with empathy and a focus on professional development, using a collaborative problem-solving stance. Dr. Lee can use the supervisory working alliance to explore Jordan's reactions, perhaps by using motivational interviewing techniques to reduce defensiveness. It is important to separate the person from the behavior, focusing on specific, observable behaviors and their consequences for clients. Dr. Lee should also model giving and receiving feedback constructively. If the defensiveness persists and interferes with supervision, Dr. Lee may need to involve the training director or suggest additional support (e.g., personal therapy). Throughout, Dr. Lee must maintain clear boundaries and not let the relationship dynamics compromise the evaluation process. Documentation of these conversations is essential.