The Partnership's Liability for a Partner's Negligence
Alex, Ben, and Chris are partners in a small accounting firm, ABC Partners. The partnership agreement is silent on liability for negligence. Alex, while working on a client's audit, negligently failed to detect a fraud, causing the client to lose £200,000. The client sues ABC Partners. Ben and Chris argue that they were not involved in the audit and should not be personally liable. Alex admits negligence but claims the partnership should bear the loss. The client also seeks to hold Ben and Chris personally liable, arguing that partners are jointly and severally liable for partnership debts. Discuss the liability of the partners under the Partnership Act 1890 and the potential for limitation of liability.
1. Determine the liability of Alex, Ben, and Chris to the client under the Partnership Act 1890.
Read the worked answer
Under s.9 of the Partnership Act 1890, partners are jointly liable for debts and obligations of the firm incurred while they are partners. Section 12 provides that a partner is jointly and severally liable for the wrongful acts or omissions of another partner acting in the ordinary course of the firm's business. Alex's negligence occurred in the course of the partnership business (an audit), so the firm is liable. Ben and Chris, as partners at the time, are jointly and severally liable with Alex to the client. Their lack of involvement is irrelevant; liability is joint and several. The client can enforce the judgment against any partner. However, as between the partners, Alex may be liable to indemnify the others if the negligence was his personal fault. The partnership agreement is silent, so the default statutory rules apply. Ben and Chris cannot escape liability to the client, but they may have a claim against Alex for indemnity. The client can recover the full £200,000 from any one of them.
2. If ABC Partners had been a limited liability partnership (LLP), how would the analysis differ?
Read the worked answer
If ABC Partners were an LLP, the partners (members) would have limited liability. Under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000, an LLP is a separate legal entity, and members are not personally liable for the debts or obligations of the LLP, except in cases of personal negligence or breach of duty. The client would have to sue the LLP, not the individual members. Alex's negligence would be attributed to the LLP, and the LLP would be liable. Ben and Chris would not be personally liable solely by virtue of being members. However, Alex could still be personally liable if the client sued him directly for his own negligence, but typically the claim is against the LLP. The LLP structure would protect Ben and Chris's personal assets. The client would recover from the LLP's assets. This highlights the difference between general partnership and LLP, and the importance of the business structure.