I Want the Ventilator Off: A Patient With ALS, a Divided Family, and a PEG Order
Mr. L, 58, has ALS and is ventilator-dependent through a tracheostomy. He is admitted to the ICU with aspiration pneumonia. He is awake, tracks with his eyes, and uses an eye-gaze device to spell. Over three days he has told you, repeatedly and consistently, that he wants the ventilator removed and to go home with hospice. He has no advance directive. His wife and adult son insist on 'full code, everything done,' saying he is depressed and 'not himself.' The resident has written an order for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement and a 14-day antibiotic course. Palliative care has not been consulted. Home hospice could start in 48 hours, but the wife states she cannot manage a ventilator at home; the inpatient hospice unit has no bed for 5 days.
1. How do you determine whether Mr. L has decision-making capacity, and what accommodations are needed for him to participate?
Read the worked answer
Capacity is decision-specific, not global. Assess four elements for this particular decision:
- Understanding: Can he explain that removing the ventilator will lead to death and what hospice means?
- Appreciation: Does he recognize how this applies to him, not just in the abstract?
- Reasoning: Can he compare options and give reasons consistent with his values?
- Choice: Can he communicate a consistent choice?
Accommodations matter. Use the eye-gaze device with a speech-language pathologist, schedule sessions when he is rested, allow extra time, and avoid yes/no leading questions. Screen for depression, but depression alone does not automatically negate capacity unless it impairs this specific decision. Consider a psychiatry consult to strengthen the assessment.
Document verbatim statements across days and settings, who was present, and how he communicated. If he has capacity, his decision supersedes his family's preferences. If he does not, follow state surrogate decision-making law and seek guardianship if needed.
2. The family demands the PEG and full code, and the resident proceeds. What advocacy actions do you take, and how do you handle the conflict without abandoning the family?
Read the worked answer
Advocacy actions:
- Ask that the PEG be paused. It is a surgical intervention requiring informed consent; a patient with capacity can refuse it.
- Notify the attending and request an ethics consultation and palliative care involvement.
- Convene a family meeting with Mr. L present via eye gaze, so his voice is in the room rather than reported secondhand.
- Clarify that withdrawing life-sustaining treatment is legally and ethically distinct from euthanasia; the goal is comfort-focused care.
Handling conflict: Explore the family's fear beneath the demand. They may fear abandonment, guilt, or that stopping the ventilator means 'starving' or 'giving up.' Use reflective listening and avoid debating them in the hallway. Say: 'You want to protect him. Help me understand what worries you most about what he is asking for.'
Do not abandon them. Keep them informed, involve chaplain and social work, and offer a structured palliative care meeting. If the resident persists without consent, escalate through nursing leadership and risk management. Document the patient's statements, the family's concerns, the consults, and the code status discussion. Support staff moral distress with a debrief.
3. What system safeguards would you put in place over the next 5 days, given no hospice bed, and how would you document?
Read the worked answer
Safeguards:
- Establish a comfort-focused ICU plan with explicit DNR/DNI and ventilator-withdrawal orders per policy.
- Use a symptom protocol: opioid for dyspnea and pain, benzodiazepine for anxiety, glycopyrrolate for secretions; stop non-beneficial interventions such as unnecessary antibiotics if consistent with comfort goals.
- Involve palliative care, ethics, chaplain, social work, and respiratory therapy in a scheduled family meeting.
- Address the placement gap: home hospice in 48 hours with a care plan, or transfer to another facility; do not let bed availability become the reason to override the patient.
- Debrief nursing staff and offer ethics support for moral distress.
Documentation: the capacity assessment with verbatim quotes, who was present, the patient's consistent choice, the family meeting, consults, code status, symptom plan, and escalation attempts. If the family threatens legal action, notify risk management. The standard is a clear, contemporaneous record that the patient's autonomous choice was assessed and honored.