ACVCP

American College of Veterinary Clinical Pharmacology Certification Examination

More study resources

About this exam

The American College of Veterinary Clinical Pharmacology (ACVCP) is a specialty board recognized by the American Veterinary Medical Association, and its certification is the credential that identifies a veterinarian as a specialist in veterinary clinical pharmacology. The College's stated objectives are to advance the discipline as a clinical specialty, assure the competence of those who practice in it, examine and certify veterinarians who meet its requirements, and support continuing education, research, and the exchange of new knowledge in the field. The credential is therefore aimed at veterinarians who have completed postdoctoral education and experience in clinical pharmacology - typically residents in approved programs - and who intend to practice, teach, or conduct research as clinical pharmacologists. Preparation is a multi-year project rather than a short cram: candidates work through the College's published candidate information, deadlines, and examination structure, build depth in both pharmacology and therapeutics, and should expect to demonstrate applied clinical reasoning, not just recall of drug facts. This page is an independent study resource and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the ACVCP; candidates should always confirm requirements, deadlines, and fees directly with the College.

What you'll study

Common questions

About ACVCP preparation

What is the ACVCP credential?

It is specialty board certification in veterinary clinical pharmacology. The College describes itself as a specialty board recognized by the American Veterinary Medical Association and certifies veterinarians who meet its requirements as specialists in veterinary clinical pharmacology. Certification signals that you have completed the College's required postdoctoral education and experience and passed its examinations.

Who should pursue it?

Veterinarians who intend to practice clinical pharmacology as a specialty - in academia, industry, regulatory work, or referral practice - and who are completing or have completed postdoctoral training in the field. The College maintains candidate, residency program, and diplomate information; check its site for current eligibility requirements before committing to a timeline.

How is the examination structured?

The College's site lists a Phase I Examination and a Phase II Examination, with Phase II credentials reviewed before that examination. It does not publish the item count, duration, or passing score on the page summarized here, so confirm the current structure, format, and scoring directly with the College rather than relying on secondhand descriptions.

How long does the whole process take?

Expect years, not months. The College frames certification around postdoctoral education and experience requirements plus a two-phase examination, and it publishes candidate deadlines and a candidate calendar. Because specific time limits and deadlines are set by the College and change periodically, verify them on the official candidate pages before you plan your application.

What does it cost, and what is the retake policy?

Fees and any retake rules are set by the College and are not stated in the source material used for this page, so we do not publish figures. Consult the College's deadlines and fees page and its candidate information documents for current amounts, payment timing, and what happens if a candidate does not pass an examination phase.

Which domain should I study first?

Start with fundamental pharmacology - pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, species differences, and mechanisms - because therapeutic reasoning depends on it. Then move to applied therapeutics, where you integrate drug selection, dosing, interactions, and species-specific safety. Studying therapeutics before the underlying pharmacology tends to produce memorized protocols that fall apart on unfamiliar cases.

How difficult is the examination?

It is a specialty board examination, so it is designed to distinguish specialists from competent general practitioners. The hard part is usually not obscure drug names but applying principles to unfamiliar species, disease states, and withdrawal or residue questions. Candidates who have genuine clinical and research experience in pharmacology, and who practice written reasoning, tend to fare better.

What are the most common failure modes?

Weak fundamentals beneath memorized facts; ignoring species differences and food-animal regulatory considerations; poor structure in written answers, where the reasoning is not shown; and underestimating the timeline, so preparation collides with residency duties. Another frequent problem is relying on outdated or unofficial summaries instead of the College's current candidate documents.

How should I prepare in the final months?

Shift from reading to producing: work through applied case scenarios, write out answers under time pressure, and get feedback from diplomates or mentors. Re-read the College's current candidate information and calendar so administrative steps do not derail you. Track weak topics from practice attempts and revisit them rather than rereading material you already know.