A late-night prescription for alprazolam written by a dentist with two repeats
A man in his late twenties presents at 22:30 to your community pharmacy with a handwritten prescription for alprazolam 1 mg tablets, quantity 60, with two repeats, issued by a dentist and dated 24 days ago. He is not a regular customer, has no insurance card and insists on paying cash. The prescription carries no diagnosis, and the dentist's stamp is partly illegible. He becomes irritated when you say you need to verify it and says another pharmacy 'always fills it'. Your pharmacy holds a licence to dispense controlled drugs. The prescriber's listed mobile number goes to voicemail and the clinic is closed.
1. List the deficiencies in this prescription and set out, step by step, what you do before deciding whether to dispense.
Read the worked answer
Deficiencies to note
- A controlled drug on a handwritten, partly illegible prescription with no indication recorded.
- Two repeats on a controlled drug - repeats are generally not permitted; a new prescription is normally required for each supply.
- Dated 24 days ago: almost certainly outside the validity period that applies to controlled/narcotic prescriptions; confirm the exact figure in the current DHA narcotics and controlled drugs circulars rather than assuming.
- Prescriber scope: alprazolam 60 tablets with repeats is not accepted routine dental prescribing. Short-term benzodiazepine cover for a dental procedure is a different matter from a 60-tablet supply with repeats.
- Prescriber identification: the stamp is illegible and there is no verifiable registration detail.
- Behavioural flags: late hour, unfamiliar patient, cash payment, reluctance to verify, pressure referencing another pharmacy.
What you do, in order
- Stay neutral; do not accuse. Say verification is a legal requirement, not a comment on him.
- Try to verify the prescriber through the official register and the clinic's landline, not the mobile, and check the prescriber's registration status and scope.
- Escalate to the pharmacist-in-charge; where the prescription appears forged or the prescriber cannot be verified, do not dispense, and handle the document according to policy - which may mean retaining it and reporting to the regulatory authority.
- Document the time, the discrepancies, every verification attempt and the outcome.
- If a genuine clinical need emerges, direct him to appropriate unscheduled care rather than leaving him with nothing.
2. How do you manage the conversation with the patient, and what do you record?
Read the worked answer
Conversation
- Keep it quiet and private; do not discuss suspicion at the counter in front of others.
- Use a neutral, rule-based script: 'Controlled medicines have to be verified with the prescriber before I can supply them, and I cannot reach the clinic tonight.'
- Give a concrete route forward: 'Come back tomorrow, or I can try the clinic again in the morning.'
- Do not bargain (e.g. 'I'll give you 10 until tomorrow') - a partial supply of a suspect controlled prescription is still a supply.
- Stay professional if he becomes irritated; if he is threatening, end the interaction and follow your safety policy.
Record
- An intervention entry: date/time, prescription details, the discrepancies found, the verification attempts (numbers called, times, outcomes).
- Advice given to the patient and his response.
- Notification to the pharmacist-in-charge and, if forgery is suspected after verification, a report to the regulatory authority with a copy of the prescription as permitted by policy.
- Keep the record factual and non-defamatory - describe what you observed, not what you concluded about the patient.