Inference Versus Literal Recall
A Grade 9 reading passage describes a character who 'kept checking the window every few minutes and re-read the same paragraph three times.' The accompanying questions ask: (1) 'What did the character do three times?' and (2) 'What does the character's behaviour suggest about their state of mind?' A student answers Q1 correctly but writes 'I don't know' for Q2. When you ask, the student says, 'The text doesn't say he was nervous, so I can't answer.' The class has been taught inference skills but this student consistently answers only literal questions. You have a 45-minute lesson and 30 students.
1. What is the student's misconception, and how would you address it in a short whole-class mini-lesson?
Read the worked answer
Misconception: the student believes that if a word (e.g., 'nervous') isn't literally in the text, the answer isn't 'in' the text. They are conflating literal recall with inference.
Mini-lesson (10 min):
- Name the distinction: 'Literal = the text says it. Inference = the text shows it; you use clues + what you know.'
- Model with the exact sentence. Circle the clues ('checking the window,' 're-read three times') and think aloud: 'People who are relaxed don't usually do this. What do repeated checking and re-reading suggest?'
- Provide a formula: Clue from text + background knowledge = inference. Require students to cite the clue.
- Quick paired practice with one new sentence, then share.
This is a 10-minute segment, leaving time for the rest of the lesson.
2. How would you get the individual student to produce an inference answer rather than 'I don't know'?
Read the worked answer
Use scaffolded questioning rather than giving the answer:
- 'What is he doing with the window?' → 'Checking it.'
- 'Why might someone check a window repeatedly?' → student offers possibilities.
- 'Which of those fits someone who is also re-reading the same paragraph?' → narrows to worry/anxiety/distraction.
- 'Now write it as: "This suggests he is ___ because the text says ___."'
This forces the clue + inference structure. It also gives the student a sentence frame so the demand isn't open-ended. Follow up by asking them to do one independently with a different sentence to check transfer, not just compliance.