AJA CJM study materials
AJA CJM study resources

The Officer Who Is Not Okay

AJA CJM · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Officer Who Is Not Okay

Officer Tran has been on the job for three years. In the last six weeks he has: called in sick four times (previously zero in three years), been written up once for a late count, and had two inmate complaints filed against him for 'attitude.' His partner says Tran 'isn't himself' and mentioned that Tran's wife left recently and he has been drinking. Yesterday Tran told a coworker 'I don't know how much longer I can do this.' The coworker reported it to you, the sergeant, but asked you not to say anything because 'Tran will freak out if he knows I told.' Tran is scheduled for a control-room rotation next week, which is a high-concentration post.

1. What are the risk indicators, and how do you weigh the coworker's request for confidentiality against your obligations?

Read the worked answer

The indicators cluster: sudden absenteeism change, performance decline, two attitude complaints, a partner's report of drinking, a recent marital loss, and the statement 'I don't know how much longer I can do this.' That last statement is ambiguous - it could mean quitting or it could mean something darker - and ambiguity is not a reason to wait. The combination of alcohol, loss, and a hopeless-sounding statement is a recognized risk pattern.

The coworker's request for confidentiality cannot be honored absolutely. You can protect the coworker's identity in most interactions, but you cannot promise that Tran will never learn a report was made, and you cannot let the request stop you from acting. The correct move is to tell the coworker: 'I will not volunteer your name, but I have a duty to act on what you told me, and I can't promise you'll never be identified.' Then act. The obligation to Tran's safety and the safety of the control room outweighs the coworker's comfort.

2. What do you do about the control-room rotation next week, and what do you do in the next 24 hours?

Read the worked answer

Next 24 hours:

  1. Do not put Tran in the control room next week until you have assessed his fitness for a high-concentration post. A control-room officer who is drinking, sleep-deprived, or in crisis is a security risk to the entire facility - the post controls doors, counts, and communication. Reassign temporarily and document the reason in neutral terms ('temporary reassignment pending supervisory assessment'), not as discipline.
  2. Have a direct, private conversation with Tran today. Ask open questions, do not accuse, do not diagnose. 'I've noticed you seem different lately and I'm concerned about you' is the opener; 'I heard you've been drinking' is not. Listen for the meaning of 'I don't know how much longer I can do this.' If there is any indication of self-harm, do not leave him alone and connect him to the EAP/crisis line immediately.
  3. Route to the EAP and, if warranted, to a fitness-for-duty process. Know your policy on mandatory referral versus voluntary. Do not promise confidentiality you cannot keep, and do not put the coworker in the room.
  4. Document the report, the conversation, the reassignment, and the referrals - factually, without speculation about his marriage or drinking.

3. The coworker later says Tran 'will know it was me.' How do you handle the fallout and protect both officers?

Read the worked answer

Acknowledge the coworker's fear as legitimate and take concrete steps rather than offering reassurance. First, do not confirm or deny who reported when Tran asks - 'I act on a range of information and I'm not going to discuss sources' is a complete answer. Second, watch for retaliation or retaliation-adjacent behavior in either direction: Tran isolating the coworker, or the coworker being frozen out by the shift. Third, separate the two on the schedule if the tension is real, without making it look like punishment.

If Tran confronts the coworker, that is a supervisory issue and you address it directly with Tran: the report was made in good faith and retaliation is not tolerated. Protect the coworker's standing on the shift by not treating him as a pariah and by being visible about it. Document the confrontation and your response. The goal is not to keep the report secret forever - it is to make sure the coworker is not punished for doing the right thing, and that Tran gets help rather than isolation.