Priya's Kitchen and the Ten-Year Lock-In
Priya, 71, owns a nonqualified deferred annuity purchased in 2012 for $180,000; it is now worth $310,000 with a 4% surrender charge that expires in 2026. She wants $60,000 for a kitchen remodel. Her agent proposes a 1035 exchange into a new fixed indexed annuity with a 10-year surrender schedule, a 7% first-year surrender charge, a 10% free-withdrawal provision, and a 20% premium bonus vesting over 10 years. Priya's only other income is $28,000 of Social Security and $14,000 of taxable interest. She is enrolled in Medicare and has a $95,000 HSA balance she still funds monthly. She also owns a $500,000 whole life policy with a $60,000 cash value.
1. What are the tax consequences of the three ways to raise $60,000: a partial withdrawal from the annuity, a policy loan, or an HSA distribution?
Read the worked answer
Annuity partial withdrawal. Nonqualified annuity withdrawals are taxed LIFO - gain comes out first. Gain is $310,000 − $180,000 = $130,000, so the entire $60,000 is ordinary income and none of her $180,000 basis is recovered. No 10% premature-distribution penalty applies because she is over 59½. But the $60,000 stacks on $14,000 of interest and up to 85% of her Social Security, pushing her marginal rate up and, because of the two-year lookback, potentially raising her Part B and Part D premiums (IRMAA). A full surrender would expose the entire $130,000.
Policy loan. Borrowing $60,000 from the whole life policy is not a taxable event provided the contract is not a modified endowment contract and remains in force. Trade-offs: the death benefit is reduced, interest accrues, and if the policy lapses with the loan outstanding, the excess over basis becomes taxable income.
HSA distribution. A kitchen is not a qualified medical expense. The distribution is taxable ordinary income - same as the annuity - but the 20% additional tax does not apply after age 65. It also permanently spends a tax-free medical asset.
Ranking. The policy loan is the only tax-free path; the annuity withdrawal is the cleanest taxable path; the HSA should be last.
2. Should Priya make the 1035 exchange? Support the recommendation with the economics and the compliance requirements.
Read the worked answer
No - the exchange fails a cost-benefit test at her age.
- Surrender charges. She would trade a 4% charge expiring in 2026 (about $2,400 on a $60,000 withdrawal) for a 10-year schedule starting at 7% - a lock-in until age 81.
- The bonus is not free. A 20% premium bonus is normally recovered through higher mortality-and-expense charges, lower caps or participation rates, or forfeiture on early surrender. It is an inducement, not a gift.
- Free withdrawal is too small. 10% of accumulated value covers roughly $30,000; the other $30,000 of her need would still trigger surrender charges.
The only real argument for the exchange is deferral - a 1035 transfer avoids current tax on the $130,000 gain. But she does not need to touch the gain; she needs $60,000 of liquidity.
Compliance requirements if she proceeds anyway. State replacement rules require a signed replacement notice, a comparison of the two contracts, notice to the existing insurer, and typically a free-look period on the new contract. Suitability/best-interest standards require documenting her liquidity needs, time horizon, and the surrender-charge cost of the recommendation. On these facts that documentation would be hard to write honestly.
Recommendation. Take the $60,000 partial withdrawal from the existing contract (about $2,400 surrender charge plus ordinary income), or wait until 2026, or use the life policy loan and leave both annuities alone.
3. Priya says she will simply take the $60,000 from her HSA instead and asks whether she can keep contributing. What do you tell her?
Read the worked answer
Contributions: no. Once she is enrolled in Medicare - any part, including premium-free Part A - she is no longer an eligible individual and cannot contribute to an HSA. Her monthly contributions are excess contributions that must stop immediately and be corrected (removed with attributable earnings, or taxed). If her Part A enrollment was ever backdated, contributions during the retroactive months are also excess.
The distribution: taxable. A kitchen remodel is not a qualified medical expense, so the $60,000 is included in gross income. The 20% additional tax does not apply because she is over 65 - the distribution is not penalized, but it is not free.
Better use of the balance. Medicare premiums (Part B, Part D, Medicare Advantage) are qualified medical expenses payable from the HSA tax-free. Medigap premiums generally are not. That makes the HSA a tax-free way to fund her Medicare costs for the rest of her life - a much better use than a kitchen.
Sequencing answer. Use the life policy loan first, the annuity second, and preserve the HSA; stop HSA contributions now regardless.