Tax Audit Exposure from Related-Party Transactions
During the audit of 'Yerevan Trading' LLC for the year ended 31 December 2023, you discover that the company purchased goods from a related party, 'Armenian Suppliers' LLC, at a price 30% above the market price. The total purchases were 500 million AMD. The related party is owned by the wife of the CEO of Yerevan Trading. The company's tax returns show a profit of 100 million AMD and paid corporate income tax at 18%. The tax authority has not raised any assessment yet. The auditor is concerned about transfer pricing rules under the Armenian Tax Code and the potential impact on the financial statements. The company argues that the price difference is due to quality differences, but no documentation supports this.
1. Explain the Armenian transfer pricing rules applicable to this transaction and assess whether an adjustment is required. What are the potential tax implications?
Read the worked answer
Under the Armenian Tax Code (Article 186 and related), transactions between related parties must be at arm's length. Related parties include individuals and legal entities where one party directly or indirectly participates in the management or control of the other, or where the same persons participate in both. Here, the CEO's wife owns the supplier, so the parties are related. The purchase price is 30% above market; unless the company can substantiate the quality difference with documentation (which it has not), the tax authority may adjust taxable profit by disallowing the excess over market price. The excess amount = 30% of 500 million = 150 million AMD. This would increase taxable profit from 100 million to 250 million AMD. Additional corporate income tax at 18% = 27 million AMD. Additionally, penalties and interest may apply. The auditor should consider whether the financial statements need adjustment or disclosure. Since the tax authority has not raised an assessment, but the position is likely to be challenged, the auditor should assess whether a provision is needed under IAS 37 or disclosure of a contingent liability. The company should be advised to prepare transfer pricing documentation.
2. What audit procedures would you perform to evaluate the transfer pricing risk and its impact on the financial statements? How would you report this in the auditor's report?
Read the worked answer
Audit procedures: (1) Obtain an understanding of the related-party relationships and transactions, including identifying all related parties. (2) Review the company's transfer pricing documentation, if any, and assess its adequacy. (3) Compare the purchase price with market prices from independent sources (e.g., comparable transactions, industry data). (4) Inquire of management about the rationale for the price difference and obtain supporting evidence for quality differences. (5) Review correspondence with tax authorities and legal advice. (6) Assess the probability of a tax adjustment and estimate the potential liability, considering the tax authority's past behavior. (7) Evaluate whether the financial statements require adjustment (if probable and measurable) or disclosure of a contingent liability. Reporting: If the auditor concludes that the tax adjustment is probable and can be estimated, and management refuses to adjust, the auditor should issue a qualified or adverse opinion depending on materiality. If the matter is adequately disclosed, the auditor may include an emphasis of matter paragraph or other matter paragraph. Given the amounts (potential 27 million AMD tax plus penalties) and profit of 100 million, this is material. The auditor should also consider the impact on the audit opinion if management does not provide sufficient evidence to support the price.