AMFTRB MFT National Exam study materials
AMFTRB MFT National Exam study resources

The Disclosing Teen and the Non-Custodial Parent

AMFTRB MFT National Exam · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Disclosing Teen and the Non-Custodial Parent

You are a licensed MFT seeing 15-year-old Jordan weekly for 6 sessions at an outpatient clinic. Jordan's parents divorced 3 years ago; mother has sole legal and physical custody, father has supervised visitation twice monthly. Jordan reveals that during the most recent visit, father's new partner struck Jordan's 9-year-old half-brother hard enough to leave a handprint. Jordan begs you not to tell anyone, saying, 'If you report it, Dad will lose visitation and he'll blame me forever.' Your state requires mandated reporting of suspected child abuse to CPS within 24 hours. The clinic's intake file lists mother as the custodial contact and father as a non-custodial parent with a court order for visitation. Jordan has no current suicidal or self-harm indicators and is attending school.

1. What is the appropriate response to Jordan's request for confidentiality, and what are your reporting obligations?

Read the worked answer

Reporting obligation is triggered and non-delegable. The disclosure describes physical abuse of a minor by a caregiver (father's partner), which meets the threshold for reasonable suspicion in essentially every U.S. jurisdiction. You must report to CPS within the statutory window (24 hours here) regardless of Jordan's request, the parents' custody arrangement, or father's potential reaction. Confidentiality yields to the duty to protect.

But the report and the therapeutic relationship are not mutually exclusive. Best practice:

  1. Acknowledge Jordan's fear directly ('You're worried this will blow up your relationship with your dad-that makes sense').
  2. Be transparent about the limit before acting: explain that you are required to report suspected harm to a child, and that you will do it in a way that includes Jordan's voice where possible.
  3. Offer to tell Jordan what you will say and when, and to be present for the conversation with mother if clinically appropriate.
  4. Report the facts you have; do not investigate or interview the half-brother or the partner. Document verbatim statements, the handprint description, and the timing.

Do not promise secrecy, delay the report to preserve alliance, or condition the report on Jordan's consent. Do not contact father first-that risks evidence tampering and further harm. The clinical task after reporting is repairing the rupture: naming that you kept your word about honesty, that Jordan was not at fault, and that safety for the half-brother is a shared value.

2. Mother calls demanding to know everything Jordan disclosed. How do you respond, and what legal/ethical framework governs?

Read the worked answer

Distinguish custody from clinical access. Mother's sole legal custody gives her decision-making authority over Jordan's treatment and access to the record, but it does not automatically entitle her to the content of a 15-year-old's therapy sessions. State minor-consent and confidentiality statutes vary; many permit a mature minor to have a confidential therapeutic relationship while parents retain a right to general information (attendance, treatment status, safety concerns).

Practical response:

  • Confirm what mother is entitled to under your state's minor-consent law and the clinic's policy before answering.
  • Provide general information: Jordan is engaged, safe, attending; a CPS report was made; safety planning is underway.
  • Decline to recite session content unless required by law or necessary for safety. Explain the rationale: adolescents need a confidential space to disclose, and forced disclosure would foreclose the very treatment mother wants.
  • If mother insists, offer a family session or a collateral meeting with a release from Jordan for specific information.

Document the request, your reasoning, the statute or policy relied upon, and what you disclosed. This is a classic competing obligations item: parental rights vs. adolescent confidentiality vs. the child's best interest. The exam-correct stance is neither 'mother gets everything' nor 'mother gets nothing'-it is a reasoned, documented, law-informed middle position.