Failed Biological Indicator on a Load That Was Already Used
Monday morning, the office's second autoclave - a 2016 gravity-displacement unit - shows a failed biological indicator from Friday's 4:15 pm load. That load contained 14 hand instruments and two curette sets, all pouched, sealed, and returned to the cabinet. You learn that nine of those instruments were used Saturday morning on three patients before anyone read the result. A recently hired RDA processed Friday's loads alone. The office has no written policy for a failed spore test; the practice's habit has been to "run the load again and see." The dentist asks you whether the three patients need to be told.
1. List your immediate actions, in order, and explain why each one is not optional.
Read the worked answer
- Take the autoclave out of service now - tag it, unplug or lock it, and tell everyone. Until the cause is found, every load is suspect.
- Pull and reprocess every surviving item from that load - the pouches that never left the cabinet go back through cleaning (they have been sitting contaminated in a sterile-looking package) then packaging and sterilization. A single re-run is not reprocessing; cleaning comes first.
- Do not "re-run and see." That habit destroys the evidence. You cannot tell whether the fix worked if you change several variables at once.
- Run a control plus a fresh BI and a chemical indicator in the unit, and check the mechanical readouts (cycle time, temperature, pressure) before returning it to service. Consider a Bowie-Dick type check if your unit and policy call for one.
- Investigate the plausible causes systematically - overloaded or overpacked tray, pouches too thick or too densely packed, wet pouches at cycle end, insufficient drying, worn door gasket, water quality, or operator error by the new RDA.
- Document everything: the load, the indicator lot and result, the items, the patients, the actions, and the corrective action. Without the load-to-patient link, you cannot answer question two.
2. The dentist asks whether the three patients must be told. How do you reason through it?
Read the worked answer
You reason from exposure, not from panic, and you recognize that the decision belongs to the dentist - your job is to give him the analysis.
What is known: instruments that were not verifiably sterilized contacted oral tissues in three patients. The realistic transmission risk is low, because most dental instruments contact intact or minimally disrupted mucosa and the organisms of concern (hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV) do not survive well on dry instruments. Low is not zero, and "low" is the wrong word to hide behind.
The framework:
- Ethics and trust - the practice knows something the patients do not that bears on their health. Silence is hard to defend if a patient later asks why the office never mentioned it.
- Regulation - many jurisdictions require reporting sterilization failures or at least following a documented look-back procedure. Check the state dental board's infection-control rules and any public health requirement before deciding.
- Risk management - a documented, timely, honest notification is far more defensible than a discovered omission.
Practical position to recommend: the dentist, not the RDA, decides and communicates; he should consider consulting the board and the autoclave manufacturer. If notification is chosen, keep it factual and brief: what happened, what was done, what the risk is, and whom to call.
3. What must change in the office so this cannot repeat, and what is the RDA's role in making that change stick?
Read the worked answer
A failed spore test is a systems failure, not a person failure - but the system has to be written down.
Policy elements:
- Every load gets a biological indicator on a defined schedule, and no load is released for use until the result is read and logged. The log ties load number, date, operator, and indicator result together - that is the only way to identify patients later.
- Implant and surgical instruments are quarantined until the result is confirmed.
- A written failure protocol: quarantine, reprocess, root-cause, document, notify per board rules.
- Competency verification for new staff before they run a sterilizer unsupervised, plus periodic re-verification and manufacturer-required maintenance records.
The RDA's role: you are usually the person who actually runs the unit, so you are the one who can make the log non-negotiable and can flag overloaded trays before they close. Raise it as a process proposal with a one-page protocol, not as an accusation of the new hire. And note the uncomfortable part honestly: the new RDA was left alone with a sterilizer and no written procedure. That is a supervision and training gap that the practice created.