The Structuring Pattern Across Three Branches
A retail bank's automated monitoring flags a customer, a 34-year-old owner of a small electronics import business, for 11 cash deposits over six weeks. Each deposit is between USD 8,500 and USD 9,800, always below the USD 10,000 reporting threshold, and they are spread across three branches in two cities. Total is about USD 101,000. The customer's stated business is wholesale, which typically involves bank transfers, not cash. When a branch manager asked about the cash, the customer said it was 'from customers who prefer cash' and became irritated. The bank's policy requires a suspicious transaction report (STR) when there are reasonable grounds to suspect laundering, and permits continued operation while an STR is filed. The relationship is otherwise profitable. The branch manager wants to 'wait and see' for another month before filing.
1. Should an STR be filed now, and what is the reasoning?
Read the worked answer
Yes, file now. The pattern meets the classic indicators of structuring: repeated cash deposits deliberately kept just under the reporting threshold, distributed across branches and cities, inconsistent with a wholesale business's normal payment profile, plus an evasive and irritated response when questioned. Structuring to avoid reporting is itself a suspicious activity regardless of whether the underlying funds are proven illicit. The standard is reasonable grounds to suspect, not proof. 'Wait and see' is inappropriate because delay allows further movement of funds and may breach the bank's obligation to report promptly. Profitability is not a relevant factor. File the STR with the facts and the pattern, and continue monitoring without tipping off the customer.
2. What immediate risk-management steps should accompany the filing, and what must you avoid telling the customer?
Read the worked answer
Accompany the STR with internal escalation, a review of the customer's full transaction history and counterparties, and consideration of enhanced monitoring or restrictions on further cash deposits pending review. Ensure the monitoring alert, decision, and rationale are recorded. Critically, do not tell the customer an STR has been or may be filed, and do not hint at it when asking follow-up questions; tipping off is prohibited. If you need information, frame requests as routine account reviews. Also consider whether the branch staff who handled the deposits need refresher training on threshold avoidance.