New Focal Deficit With a Normal Head CT
A 68-year-old right-handed man is brought in 2 hours after sudden onset of right face and arm weakness and difficulty finding words. He has hypertension and atrial fibrillation; he takes warfarin but admits he has missed doses for a week. On exam: BP 178/96, HR irregularly irregular at 96, NIHSS 7 (right facial droop, right arm drift, mild expressive aphasia). Fingerstick glucose 118. Noncontrast head CT 30 minutes after arrival shows no hemorrhage and no early ischemic change. INR is 1.4. Last known well was 2 hours ago and he was seen by his wife as normal at that time.
1. Is he a candidate for reperfusion therapy? Walk through the decision step by step.
Read the worked answer
Step 1 - Time window. Last known well 2 hours ago, within the 4.5-hour intravenous thrombolysis window. Confirm with the wife that he was truly normal at that time; if onset is uncertain, use last known well.
Step 2 - Hemorrhage excluded. Noncontrast CT shows no hemorrhage. A normal CT at 2 hours does not exclude ischemia; early CT is often normal, and the decision to treat is clinical.
Step 3 - Anticoagulation status. He takes warfarin but INR is 1.4, which is below the 1.7 threshold that generally excludes thrombolysis. A documented INR ≤1.7 is acceptable per guidelines. This is the key judgment: do not reflexively exclude a warfarin patient - check the number.
Step 4 - Other contraindications. BP 178/96 is below the 185/110 threshold, so no pretreatment BP lowering is required (but monitor closely). Glucose normal. No recent surgery, GI bleed, or seizure described. NIHSS 7 is disabling and treatable.
Step 5 - Large vessel occlusion? NIHSS 7 with aphasia and face/arm weakness could reflect a dominant MCA occlusion. Obtain CTA/vascular imaging to assess for LVO, because he may be a candidate for mechanical thrombectomy even beyond the thrombolysis window.
Conclusion: He is a candidate for IV thrombolysis after confirming no other contraindications, and should be evaluated concurrently for thrombectomy.
2. What is the evidence-based blood pressure management around thrombolysis, and how do you handle his atrial fibrillation afterward?
Read the worked answer
Before thrombolysis: lower BP to <185/110 mmHg. His 178/96 is already below threshold, so proceed without pretreatment antihypertensives.
During and after thrombolysis: maintain <180/105 for at least 24 hours. Use labetalol or nicardipine with frequent monitoring; avoid abrupt drops that could worsen penumbral perfusion.
Anticoagulation and AF:
- Do not restart warfarin in the first 24 hours after thrombolysis; obtain follow-up imaging (typically 24 hours) before resuming any anticoagulant.
- His subtherapeutic INR and missed doses are the proximate cause of this stroke - this is a systems and adherence failure, not just a biology failure.
- After the acute period, address anticoagulation strategy: consider a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for AF if renal function permits, which has better adherence and safety profiles than warfarin in many patients.
- Involve the patient and family in an adherence plan; missed-dose patterns must be identified and addressed.
Judgment being tested: knowing the INR and BP thresholds precisely, not treating a normal CT as evidence against stroke, and recognizing adherence failure as the root cause to prevent recurrence.
3. His symptoms fluctuate over the next 12 hours and then worsen. What does this suggest and what do you do?
Read the worked answer
Fluctuation after thrombolysis suggests either:
- Reocclusion or incomplete recanalization of the culprit vessel - particularly likely if he had an LVO that was not fully opened.
- Hemorrhagic transformation - especially concerning after thrombolysis.
- Cerebral edema with mass effect.
- Seizure or post-ictal state masquerading as worsening.
Actions:
- Emergent noncontrast head CT to exclude hemorrhage before any further antithrombotic decision.
- Repeat vascular imaging (CTA) to assess vessel patency; if an LVO persists and he is within the thrombectomy window, he may still be a candidate.
- Neurologic reassessment with repeat NIHSS; check glucose, electrolytes, and oxygenation.
- Blood pressure and airway reassessment; if there is edema or deterioration, consider ICU-level care.
- Do not give additional thrombolytic - repeat dosing is not standard and increases hemorrhage risk.
Judgment being tested: recognizing that post-thrombolysis deterioration is a time-critical emergency with a defined differential, and that imaging comes before any further anticoagulation.