Three Sources, One Wall Label: First Contact in the Rio Grande
The county historical society must approve one 60-word wall label for a new exhibit on the ancestral Pueblo world and Spanish entry into the Rio Grande valley. Three items are available. (A) A 1598 missionary report claiming 800 baptisms in a single season and describing the conversions as voluntary. (B) A Hopi clan narrative, recorded by an anthropologist in 1932, recalling the Spaniards as men who brought sickness and demanded corn. (C) Archaeobotanical samples from a pueblo six miles away: maize appears in 71% of samples dated 1300-1450 but only 44% of samples dated 1550-1620, while wheat and sheep bone rise. The board wants a label that is accurate and defensible, and the director has ruled that no statement may rest on a single source.
1. Each item is strongest on a different question. Match each one to the question it can actually answer, and name one question none of the three can answer.
Read the worked answer
Match each source to its question.
- (A) answers: what Spanish officials chose to record and report. Baptisms are administrative counts produced by men whose standing depended on visible success; 800 baptisms establishes that rites were performed and claimed, not that belief followed.
- (B) answers: what a descendant community preserved and how it framed the encounter. Recorded in 1932, it cannot date 1598 events, but its emphasis on sickness and demanded corn is evidence about remembered coercion.
- (C) answers: what people actually ate, in dated layers. The fall from 71% to 44% maize and the rise of wheat and sheep is material change; it does not by itself identify cause, since mission residence, livestock introduction, drought, or labor drafts could all produce it.
None of the three can answer whether any individual Pueblo person believed Catholic teaching. Belief leaves no count, no sherd, and no later memory tied to a named person in 1598. The label must therefore be written about documented practices and contested meanings, not about sincerity.
2. Draft the 60-word label claim and identify the single sentence the director should cut from an earlier draft.
Read the worked answer
A defensible draft: 'After 1598, Pueblo communities in this valley lived with Spanish missionaries, soldiers, and livestock. Mission records claim hundreds of baptisms; Pueblo oral traditions remember sickness and demanded corn; botanical samples show maize declining as wheat and sheep spread. Each source describes a different part of the same upheaval. What individuals believed, no record preserves.'
Why it holds: every clause is attributed ('mission records claim,' 'oral traditions remember,' 'samples show'), and the change it asserts is measurable. It never equates baptism with conversion, and it never implies all Pueblo people experienced contact identically.
The sentence to cut: 'The Spanish converted the Pueblo.' That fuses a self-report into a fact about Pueblo interior life and is undercut by (B). The softer variant 'the mission baptized 800' is still risky without 'claimed,' because the number is unreplicated. The single-source rule is doing real work: it blocks exactly the tidy sentence a narrative wants.
3. What evidence would falsify the claim that the 1598 conversions were voluntary? Name two kinds and explain what each would show.
Read the worked answer
Falsifying evidence, two kinds:
- Coercion records. Spanish administrative correspondence about labor drafts, punishment of flight, or orders resettling baptized families into mission compounds. If baptism is routinely followed by confinement or labor obligation, 'voluntary' fails as a description of the conditions of choice, whatever an individual's motives were.
- Settlement and demographic data. If the 1550-1620 samples show population concentrating at mission sites, with elevated skeletal stress markers or epidemic disease, then baptism tracks coerced relocation rather than religious decision.
The reasoning: a claim is historical rather than rhetorical only if you can name what would count against it. Note the residual problem: none of this reaches interior belief, so the honest conclusion concerns the conditions of choice, not sincerity. And 'voluntary' may be the wrong variable altogether; food, protection from rival groups, and survival were probably the operative stakes.