Sixty Barrels of Corn: A Freedmen's Bureau Allocation, October 1865
October 1865. You are a Freedmen's Bureau sub-assistant commissioner for a coastal South Carolina district. Your quarterly allotment has arrived: 400 blankets, 60 barrels of corn, one contract surgeon, and no money for wages. Island A holds 1,200 freedpeople on abandoned rice plantations now leased to Northern investors; they are paid in scrip redeemable only at the lessee's store. Island B holds 700 households farming 30- to 40-acre plots without contracts, with no school and neighboring planters filing claims under restored titles. Island C holds 500 people; dysentery and a possible smallpox case are reported, there is no doctor, and a Navy gunboat lies offshore. The circular from Washington instructs you to encourage industry and self-support and to avoid creating habits of dependency.
1. Allocate the blankets, corn, and surgeon among the three islands, and defend the allocation with an explicit criterion.
Read the worked answer
Criterion, stated first: prevent death this quarter, then dismantle the arrangements that make relief necessary again next quarter. Relief that saves no lives and changes no structures is wasted; relief that prevents death while leaving scrip intact buys ninety days.
Allocation:
- Island C: 12 barrels, 120 blankets, the surgeon, and a request for a medical officer. Possible smallpox plus dysentery plus no physician is the only acute mortality risk on your list. The surgeon's first job is to confirm or rule out smallpox, because that diagnosis governs everything else.
- Island A: 28 barrels, 180 blankets, and your personal inspection of the store. Twelve hundred people paid in scrip at a captive store are the largest population with the least cash. Record the markup against mainland prices; that record is an argument, not charity.
- Island B: 20 barrels, 100 blankets, and legal help on the title claims. No epidemic, but no contracts means no enforceable wage and no defense against title claims.
What the arithmetic cannot do: 60 barrels will not feed 2,400 people. You are triaging, and saying so is more honest than pretending the allotment is adequate.
2. The circular warns against dependency. Is the scrip system a form of dependency, and if so, who depends on whom?
Read the worked answer
The circular misidentifies the dependency. 'Dependency' implies a person who will not work. Island A's laborers are working; they are paid in a currency spendable at one counter, at prices the employer sets. The dependence runs from worker to employer, and it was created by the lease and the scrip, not by the Bureau's corn. Withdraw the corn and dependence on the store deepens, which is the opposite of the circular's stated intent.
Why the language exists: the circular is written for a Northern public and a Congress counting costs. It is a budget document wearing a moral vocabulary; its function is to cap expenditure and reassure taxpayers that freedpeople will be pushed into the labor market.
How to use it: comply with the letter, requiring work and recording output, while documenting the store's markup and the absence of cash wages. Then the self-support standard indicts the lease rather than the laborers. Reporting the price list upward is more effective than defying the circular.
3. Which is the better measure of your success this quarter: crop output per acre, or the terms on which labor contracts are made? Explain.
Read the worked answer
Crop output is the wrong measure. Output per acre can rise while freedom falls: gang labor enforced by the planter's own police, a company store, and withheld wages can all produce a bumper crop. Output measures the interest of the landholder and the tax collector, not the laborer's position.
A better measure: the terms of labor, tracked over time, including cash versus scrip, wages against local store prices, whether a worker can leave, whether the contract is enforceable in a court the worker can reach, and how many households hold land they can keep. Add a simple indicator: how many contracts were renegotiated at the workers' initiative and won.
Why it matters: these measures test whether the Bureau's presence changed bargaining power. A school enrollment count plus a contract-terms series would reveal whether 1865's arrangements were temporary improvisation or the foundation of something worse. Output alone cannot distinguish the two.