APHN-BC study materials
APHN-BC study resources

Postoperative Pain, Opioid Tolerance, and the Ethics of Advocacy

APHN-BC · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Postoperative Pain, Opioid Tolerance, and the Ethics of Advocacy

Mr. R, 58, is 18 hours post open reduction of a femur fracture. He has a documented history of opioid use disorder in sustained remission for 4 years and takes buprenorphine 16 mg daily. His current orders are hydromorphone 0.5 mg IV every 4 hours as needed, and he rates pain 9/10, diaphoretic, with a heart rate of 112 and blood pressure 156/92. The oncoming night nurse states, "He's drug-seeking; his buprenorphine should cover him, and we shouldn't be feeding a habit." His wife is at the bedside and asks why he is suffering. The attending is off-site and reachable only by pager.

1. Identify the clinical, ethical, and systems issues in this situation and articulate the nurse's immediate advocacy priorities.

Read the worked answer

Clinical: Unrelieved acute pain with sympathetic signs (HR 112, BP 156/92, diaphoresis) in a patient on buprenorphine. Buprenorphine is a partial agonist with high mu affinity; it does not reliably provide acute surgical analgesia and can blunt the effect of pure agonists. A 0.5 mg hydromorphone q4h order is likely inadequate for severe post-op pain in an opioid-tolerant patient. Untreated severe pain is itself a harm and, in a person with OUD in remission, a relapse risk.

Ethical: The night nurse's statement reflects stigma and a substituted judgment that conflicts with the duty to treat pain, nonmaleficence, and respect for persons. Withholding indicated analgesia based on a diagnosis rather than assessment is discriminatory. The patient's report is the primary data; objective signs corroborate it.

Systems: Off-site attending, inadequate PRN order, and a colleague expressing intent to under-treat.

Immediate priorities: (1) Assess and document pain, sedation, respiratory rate, and function; (2) page the attending with a structured SBAR request for an appropriate multimodal/opioid-tolerant regimen and clarify buprenorphine continuation; (3) implement nonpharmacologic comfort and repositioning; (4) address the colleague's plan directly and, if the patient remains untreated, escalate through the charge nurse and rapid response or on-call chain; (5) support the wife with clear information without breaching confidentiality.

2. The attending returns the page and says, "Just give him ibuprofen; I'm not writing for more narcotics." What is the nurse's next best action, and how should the nurse frame the conversation?

Read the worked answer

The nurse should not simply comply with an order that leaves severe, objectively corroborated pain untreated. Next best action is a focused, respectful, evidence-based escalation: restate the assessment findings, name the specific clinical concern, and request a specific alternative (e.g., multimodal regimen, higher or more frequent opioid, anesthesia/pain service consult).

Framing example: "Mr. R is 18 hours post-op with 9/10 pain, HR 112, BP 156/92, and diaphoresis. He takes buprenorphine 16 mg daily, so his baseline is not adequate for acute surgical pain. Ibuprofen alone will not cover this. I'm requesting a multimodal plan and either a higher or more frequent opioid order or a pain service consult. I'll document that I raised this concern."

If the physician still refuses, the nurse documents the refusal and the assessment, notifies the charge nurse and nursing supervisor, and uses the chain of command. The nurse does not abandon the patient; ongoing reassessment and nonpharmacologic measures continue. The ethical principle is fidelity to the patient and nonmaleficence; the professional obligation is to advocate through legitimate channels rather than to comply silently or to administer without an order.

3. How should the nurse approach the colleague's "drug-seeking" comment and the wife's question at the bedside?

Read the worked answer

With the colleague: Address it privately and directly, using a non-accusatory but clear frame. Name the behavior and its risk: "Calling him drug-seeking based on his OUD history is stigmatizing and could lead to under-treatment. His vitals and report are consistent with severe pain. Let's focus on the assessment." Offer to review the pharmacology of buprenorphine together. If the pattern persists, raise it with the charge nurse or through a peer-review/quality channel; patient safety and equity of care are at stake.

With the wife: Acknowledge her concern, provide clear, nonjudgmental information about the plan and what is being done, and avoid discussing the colleague's comment or confidential details. Example: "I hear that this is frightening. His pain is real, and we are working to get him an effective plan. I've paged the doctor and will keep you updated." Maintain the patient's privacy, confirm what he wants shared, and offer to stay with her briefly or connect her with a patient representative. The goal is to preserve trust and dignity while the clinical and systems issues are resolved.