Interprofessional Conflict Over a Family's Requested Intervention
In an inpatient palliative care unit, a 79-year-old patient with advanced dementia and aspiration pneumonia is dying. The family asks that "everything be done," including ICU transfer and intubation, although the patient's advance directive names a daughter as surrogate and states "comfort-focused care; no intubation." The intensivist says, "The family is asking; we should just intubate to avoid a complaint." The bedside nurse believes intubation is not in the patient's interest and conflicts with the directive. The daughter who is the named surrogate has not been reached; a different son is making the request.
1. Identify the ethical, legal, and communication issues and the nurse's role.
Read the worked answer
Ethical: Beneficence/nonmaleficence (intubation likely prolongs dying without benefit in advanced dementia with aspiration pneumonia), respect for autonomy as expressed in the advance directive, and surrogate decision-making standards (substituted judgment). Family disagreement and the authority of the named surrogate versus another son.
Legal: The advance directive names a specific surrogate; that person's authority generally governs. The directive's "no intubation" is a clear instruction. Intubating solely to avoid a complaint is not an ethical basis; defensive medicine can harm the patient.
Communication: The family is frightened and may equate "everything" with love. The intensivist's framing is avoidant. The named surrogate has not been reached, and the wrong decision-maker may be speaking.
Nurse's role: Advocate for the patient's documented wishes, ensure the correct surrogate is contacted, request an ethics consult and palliative care involvement, and support the family. The nurse does not make the final decision but must ensure the process is correct and the patient's voice is honored.
2. What concrete steps should the nurse take in the next hour?
Read the worked answer
- Verify documents: Confirm the advance directive and the named surrogate; place a copy in the chart and flag it.
- Contact the surrogate: Make repeated, documented attempts to reach the named daughter; leave messages; use emergency contacts. Do not let the son's request substitute for the surrogate's authority without confirming.
- Convene: Request an urgent huddle with the intensivist, palliative care, charge nurse, and, if available, ethics. Present the directive and the clinical picture.
- Family meeting: With the surrogate (by phone if needed), use a structured conversation: ask what the patient would have wanted, reflect the directive, explain what intubation would and would not achieve, and offer comfort-focused alternatives. Use an interpreter if needed.
- Document all attempts, conversations, and the directive.
- Comfort: Continue symptom management and presence; do not withdraw support while the process unfolds.
- Escalate through the chain of command and ethics if the team proceeds contrary to the directive or without the surrogate.
3. The son says, "You're trying to kill my father." How should the nurse respond?
Read the worked answer
Respond with empathy first, then clarity, without defensiveness or false reassurance. Example: "I hear how much you love your father, and I am not trying to end his life. I want to make sure we give him the care he asked for. His directive says he did not want a breathing tube. Can we talk about what he would have wanted and what comfort care looks like?"
Do not argue about the directive; invite the son to tell you about his father. Name the goal: comfort, dignity, and honoring his wishes. Offer the palliative care team and chaplain, and include the named surrogate in the conversation. Avoid promising a specific outcome; explain the process. Document the conversation. If conflict persists, use ethics consultation; the nurse remains a steady, nonjudgmental presence and continues comfort care.