Notes that cost the answer
Daniel is practising the Aptis Advanced Listening monologue task: a recording of roughly two minutes, heard twice, with multiple-choice questions. On the first pass he writes continuous notes and fills most of a page. By the time the speaker reaches the final point, which carries one of the questions, Daniel is still writing the previous sentence and misses it. He also records costs will rise at 0:50; at 1:05 the speaker says, That was the assumption; in practice, costs fell. Daniel's page contains only the first statement. On the second pass he tries to read his notes and listen at the same time, and misses a second item.
1. What is wrong with Daniel's note-taking, and what should appear on the page instead?
Read the worked answer
He is transcribing, not listening. Writing full sentences consumes working memory that should be decoding the audio, and the lag is why he loses the closing point.
What should be on the page:
- Numbers, names and dates only - the items that cannot be reconstructed from gist.
- Structural signposts:
1st,however,so,result. - Arrows and symbols for change or contrast (
↑,≠,→). - A question mark beside anything he wants to re-check on the second pass.
He should never write a sentence he could paraphrase in three words. The test of a good note is whether it helps him locate an answer, not whether it preserves the wording.
2. The 0:50 statement contradicts the 1:05 statement. What is the significance of this, and how should it change his second listening?
Read the worked answer
It signals self-correction, which is a standard device in these monologues. That was the assumption; in practice... is an explicit revision marker: the earlier claim is being withdrawn, not supplemented.
Implications:
- The later statement is the one the question is testing. The earlier one exists to catch candidates who stop listening once they hear a matching phrase.
- Daniel should not treat the second pass as a re-run of the first. It is a targeted check: he looks at his question marks, predicts where in the recording each answer sits, and listens only for those segments.
- Markers to listen for next time:
in practice,actually,having said that,it turned out,contrary to. Any of these can overturn what precedes it.
3. Should Daniel read his notes while the audio is playing? Justify the answer.
Read the worked answer
No - with one narrow exception.
Reading and listening compete for the same phonological processing resource, which is why his second pass produced a second miss. Notes should be read:
- before each pass begins, while the track is silent, to set expectations;
- between passes, if the format allows a pause;
- after the final pass, when he is transferring answers.
During playback his eyes should be on the question stems, not on his own handwriting. The practical rule: notes exist to be read in the gaps, not in the audio. If Daniel cannot resist glancing down, he should restructure the notes so they are shorter and scannable in one second.