The Referral Fee and the Contractor's 'Free Inspection'
An independent adjuster, Dana, handles property claims for several carriers. A roofing contractor, RoofPro, offers Dana $500 for each claim she refers to them. RoofPro also runs 'free roof inspections' and tells homeowners that 'your adjuster already approved it' before Dana has even inspected. Dana refers three insureds to RoofPro in one month and accepts $1,500. One insured later says Dana told her RoofPro was 'the only contractor that works with her company.' Dana also sits on a local claims association board and markets herself as 'the adjuster your insurer trusts.' Arkansas ethics rules for adjusters prohibit conflicts of interest and misrepresentation, and require fidelity to the insurer and fair dealing with claimants.
1. Identify the ethical violations in Dana's conduct and explain why each matters.
Read the worked answer
Several problems:
- Undisclosed referral fees - accepting $500 per referral from a contractor creates a conflict of interest and undermines impartial claim handling; it must be disclosed and is generally prohibited without authorization.
- Misrepresentation - telling the insured RoofPro is 'the only contractor that works with her company' is false and steers the claimant improperly.
- False approval implication - RoofPro's 'your adjuster already approved it' statement, if Dana knew or tolerated it, misrepresents claim status.
- Improper marketing - 'the adjuster your insurer trusts' may overstate authority/endorsement.
Each erodes the adjuster's duty of fair dealing, honesty, and fidelity to the insurer and claimant.
2. What should Dana have done, and what should the insurer do now?
Read the worked answer
Dana should have declined the referral fees, disclosed any contractor relationship, avoided steering claimants to a single vendor, and made no statements implying pre-approval. She should have let insureds choose their own contractors and kept claim decisions independent.
The insurer should review the affected claims for improper steering, correct any misrepresentations to insureds, evaluate whether Dana's recommendations were influenced by the fees, and consider reporting/disciplinary steps consistent with adjuster licensing and ethics requirements. Document the review.