Records Request After Termination and an Unpaid Balance
A former client, Tanya, ended therapy with counselor Greg six months ago after 22 sessions. She now requests a complete copy of her record, including Greg's psychotherapy notes, and says she is gathering materials for a potential complaint against him. Greg is irritated: Tanya owes $640 in unpaid fees, and he believes she is 'fishing' for a case. He is inclined to release only a summary letter he writes and to withhold the notes and the portions he thinks are unflattering. He also wonders whether he can condition release on payment of the balance. Tanya has signed a valid authorization for release to herself.
1. Evaluate Greg's plan to release only a summary and to withhold unflattering portions. What does the client's right of access generally require?
Read the worked answer
Greg's plan is not defensible. A client's request for her own record is generally entitled to the records that were used to make decisions about her care, and a counselor should not curate the file to remove content he finds unflattering or that might support a complaint. Writing a substitute summary instead of producing the record is a form of selective disclosure that undermines the client's access rights. Psychotherapy notes occupy a narrower category than the formal record and may be treated differently from the clinical record, so Greg should determine which documents are process notes versus the treatment record and respond accurately to each category rather than lumping them together to justify withholding. He should consult the applicable rules and, if uncertain, seek guidance before responding.
2. Can Greg condition release of the record on payment of the $640 balance? Explain the reasoning.
Read the worked answer
No. Withholding a client's own record to collect a debt improperly uses the record as leverage and interferes with her access and her ability to pursue a complaint or continue care elsewhere. Fee disputes are handled separately through billing, a payment agreement, or collections, not by refusing access. Greg may pursue the balance through lawful means and may communicate about it, but the records response should proceed on its own track. Conditioning access on payment also risks a Board complaint and undermines the appearance of good faith. He should document the balance separately and respond to the records request within the applicable timeframe.
3. Tanya says she is gathering materials for a complaint. How should that knowledge affect Greg's handling of the request, and what should he document?
Read the worked answer
The stated purpose should not change his obligations; if anything, it requires scrupulous compliance. He should respond timely, provide the records to which she is entitled, and avoid any retaliatory or defensive alteration of the file. He should not add editorial commentary to the record, backdate entries, or destroy anything. He should document the date the request was received, the authorization, what was produced and what was withheld and on what basis, and the method of delivery. If he believes a portion is properly withheld, he should state the basis clearly rather than silently omitting it. Treating a potential complainant fairly and transparently is both an ethical obligation and the best protection in any later review.