The Grandfathered Shed That Isn't
Buyer is under contract on a 0.4-acre lot in an Arkansas city zoned R-1. The zoning code requires 5-foot side setbacks and limits accessory buildings to 200 sq ft. A 12x16 shed (192 sq ft) sits 2 feet from the side lot line; county records show it was built in 1999, before the current code was adopted in 2004. The subdivision plat also contains a 1995 restrictive covenant: 'No outbuildings shall be erected closer than 10 feet to any side lot line.' Seller's disclosure says 'shed is grandfathered; buyer can enlarge.' Buyer wants to add a 10-foot lean-to. The listing agent says 'nonconforming use means you can do anything.'
1. Is the shed a valid nonconforming use, and can the buyer add the lean-to? Explain the distinction between zoning nonconformity, a variance, and a private covenant.
Read the worked answer
Zoning. A nonconforming use is protected only to the extent it lawfully existed when the ordinance was adopted. The 1999 shed may be a legal nonconforming structure as to the 5-foot setback if the records prove it was lawful when built. But the 10-foot lean-to is a new enlargement, not the continuation of the old use. Most codes treat expansion of a nonconforming structure as requiring a variance or conditional use approval; the buyer cannot rely on 'grandfathered' status to enlarge.
Covenant. The 1995 plat restriction is private and independent of zoning. Even if the city approves a variance, the shed's 2-foot placement may violate the 10-foot covenant and neighbors could seek enforcement. Zoning approval does not cure a private covenant.
Conclusion. The shed may be a limited nonconforming structure, but the lean-to is not automatically allowed. The buyer needs written zoning verification and covenant review before proceeding.
2. What should the buyer's agent advise the buyer to do before removing contingencies, and what contract and title steps protect the buyer?
Read the worked answer
The buyer's agent should not rely on the seller's disclosure or the listing agent's statement. The agent should advise the buyer to obtain written zoning verification from the city, a copy of the plat and covenants, and advice from a real estate attorney before removing any contingency.
The contract should include a zoning/covenant contingency and, if the setback is material, a survey. The title commitment should be reviewed for covenant exceptions and any survey matters. The buyer should not waive the appraisal or financing contingency until the approval risk is resolved, because a later enforcement action or permit denial could make the property unusable for the buyer's planned lean-to.