The Only Available Reviewer
You are the only qualified reviewer available to evaluate a critical vendor security assessment before a contract renewal in 48 hours. The vendor's implementation lead is a former colleague with whom you co-authored a patent four years ago; you have no current financial interest. Your manager says disclosure is enough and asks you to proceed. The assessment includes a finding that could disqualify the vendor. The alternative reviewer is on leave for two weeks, and the renewal has a regulatory deadline. If you decline, the contract lapses and service continuity is at risk.
1. Do you accept the review, and what controls make it defensible?
Read the worked answer
Conditional acceptance, not disclosure alone. The prior co-authored patent and the former colleague relationship are not a current financial interest, but they create a reasonable appearance of partiality, especially because the assessment contains a disqualifying finding. Disclosure to the manager is necessary but not sufficient.
Controls that make it defensible:
- Written conflict disclosure to compliance and the contract owner before starting.
- A second qualified reviewer independently signs off on the disqualifying finding; I do not make the final disqualification decision alone.
- No private communication with the former colleague; all vendor contact goes through the procurement channel.
- Recusal from the final award decision; my role is limited to producing the technical assessment.
- A documented rationale for why no alternative reviewer was available within the 48-hour window.
If the second reviewer cannot be secured, decline and escalate for an emergency alternate or a short contract extension. Service continuity does not justify a sole, conflicted decision on a disqualifying finding.
2. What would you refuse to do, and what would you document?
Read the worked answer
Refuse to:
- Sign a statement that there is no conflict of interest.
- Be the sole approver of the disqualifying finding.
- Suppress or soften the finding to meet the renewal deadline.
- Communicate privately with the former colleague about the assessment.
Document: the relationship and dates, the disclosure recipients, the controls applied, the second reviewer's independent conclusion, the alternative-reviewer search, the regulatory deadline, and the service-continuity risk. If the manager directs me to proceed without a second reviewer, record the direction, my objection, and the residual risk in writing. That record protects the integrity of the decision even if the deadline forces a business risk.