ASE A8 study materials
ASE A8 study resources

Intermittent Misfire Under Load on a Coil-On-Plug V8: A Flawed Swap Test

ASE A8 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Intermittent Misfire Under Load on a Coil-On-Plug V8: A Flawed Swap Test

2019 V8 sedan, 5.0 L, 63,000 miles, coil-on-plug ignition. The driver reports the MIL flashed for about 20 seconds during a highway merge and then went out. Stored codes: P0307 and P0300. Freeze frame for P0307: 2,850 rpm, 47 mph, calculated load 68 percent, coolant 197°F, STFT -3 percent, LTFT +2 percent. Misfire counter data at idle shows cylinder 7 at 12 counts; after a 30-second hold at 2,500 rpm in gear, cylinder 7 is at 460 counts and every other cylinder is at 0. Compression is within 8 percent across all eight cylinders. The technician swaps ignition coil 7 with coil 5 and spark plug 7 with plug 3, then road-tests. Cylinder 7 still shows the misfire (380 counts), while cylinders 3 and 5 both read 0. Plug 7 is black and wet with fuel; its gap measures 0.044 in., matching specification.

1. Evaluate the swap test. Given that both parts were moved at once, how much can you actually conclude, and what does the result tell you?

Read the worked answer

The swap was methodologically sloppy but, in this particular case, still informative - because the misfire did not move.

The logic:

  • The classic rule is move one part at a time. When you move two components simultaneously, a misfire that stays on the original cylinder is still a valid exclusion of both parts (neither one caused it). A misfire that moves would be ambiguous - you would not know whether the coil or the plug was responsible.
  • Here the misfire stayed on cylinder 7 at 380 counts, while cylinders 3 and 5 - now carrying plug 7 and coil 7 respectively - both read 0. So coil 7 and plug 7 are both functionally good, and the misfire stayed with the location, not the parts.
  • That shifts suspicion to anything still physically attached to cylinder 7: the injector, the injector driver circuit, the intake port seal at that runner, valve train, or a mechanical fault.
  • The black, fuel-wet plug is a consequence, not a cause. A cylinder that misfires under load gets fuel but no clean burn, so the plug soots. Its gap is correct, which further removes it from suspicion.

Lesson to state plainly: if the misfire had moved, this test would have been worthless and the technician would have had to start over. One component at a time, one road test at a time, one cylinder's counters at a time.

2. The freeze frame shows near-zero fuel trims and the misfire is load-dependent, not idle-dependent. What does that narrow, and what is your next test sequence?

Read the worked answer

Fuel trims near zero (STFT -3, LTFT +2) largely exclude a grossly rich or lean mixture as the cause of this misfire. A leaking or plugged injector on one cylinder would typically show up as a bank-level trim shift; +2/-3 percent says the bank is metering correctly overall.

Load dependence is the strongest clue. A misfire that appears at 68 percent calculated load and 2,850 rpm but not at idle is a demand problem: high cylinder pressure makes it much harder to jump the gap and much less forgiving of a weak injector, a poor connection, or a marginal spark path.

Test sequence:

  1. Move injector 7 to a different cylinder (one component, one road test). If the misfire moves, the injector is at fault. If it stays, the injector is excluded.
  2. Check the injector circuit - resistance compared to a known cylinder, and a current-ramp or noid-light pattern while the harness is flexed. A chafed harness that opens under engine torque/load is exactly this symptom and will not show up at idle in the bay.
  3. Perform an injector balance/power-balance test to quantify each cylinder's contribution rather than relying on counters alone.
  4. Inspect the intake runner and port gasket at cylinder 7 for a leak that only opens as the manifold flexes under load - this can create a lean misfire on one cylinder without moving bank-level trims enough to notice.
  5. Recheck ignition secondary on cylinder 7 with the coil reinstalled, looking for carbon tracking at the boot or a corroded spring, since the coil tested good in a different hole but the interface stayed behind.

Do not sell eight coils. The data excludes coil failure.

3. The customer says the light went out on its own, so the car is fixed and they will keep driving. How do you respond, and what does the freeze frame add?

Read the worked answer

The self-clearing lamp is not evidence of repair - it is evidence that the fault is intermittent.

Explain the mechanism:

  • OBD-II misfire logic runs continuously. A misfire that exceeds the catalyst-damaging threshold sets a flashing MIL in real time. When the misfire stops exceeding that threshold, the lamp reverts to steady, and after a number of warm-up cycles without a recurrence, the ECM clears the code on its own.
  • So the sequence the customer experienced - flash, then off - maps precisely onto an intermittent load-dependent fault. The condition that triggered it (68 percent load at 2,850 rpm during a highway merge) simply has not recurred yet.

What the freeze frame adds:

  • It captures the exact operating window where the fault lives: 2,850 rpm, 47 mph, 68 percent load, engine at full operating temperature. That is a reproducible road-test target. Duplicating that condition is how you prove a repair, not idling in the bay.
  • Coolant at 197°F rules out a cold-start or open-loop contributor, and steady trims rule out a mixture problem, sharpening the diagnosis to a demand-related ignition or injection issue on one cylinder.

Recommendation: the vehicle should be diagnosed now, not later. Each flashing event pushes unburned charge into the converter, and a converter is far more expensive than the injector or harness repair likely needed here. Document the misfire counts in writing so the customer understands the fault is still present, and re-run the load test after repair at the same rpm and load to confirm counts stay at zero.