ASFMRA AAC study materials
ASFMRA AAC study resources

Choosing the Right Elective for a Water-Rights Assignment

ASFMRA AAC · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Choosing the Right Elective for a Water-Rights Assignment

An agricultural consulting firm has assigned you to advise a grower cooperative on the economics of transferring a portion of its irrigation water rights to a municipal buyer. You have strong crop-budget and farm-management credentials but no formal training in water law or water-market transactions. The committee requires approved consulting-related education, and you have 18 months before the project deliverable is due. Two options are available: a 40-hour water-resources economics short course offered through a university extension program, and a two-day seminar on negotiation skills. Your budget covers one.

1. Which elective best serves the assignment, and how do you justify it to the committee?

Read the worked answer

The water-resources economics short course, because it addresses the substantive gap that threatens the deliverable. The assignment turns on water-market economics - pricing, transfer mechanics, third-party effects - not on general negotiation technique. Justify by mapping the elective content to the project tasks: which sessions cover transfer valuation, which cover institutional constraints. A two-day negotiation seminar is a general skill and does not close the specific competency gap. The committee's standard is consulting-related education approved in advance, so submit the course syllabus and a short memo connecting the content to the engagement before enrolling.

2. What if the committee approves only the negotiation seminar?

Read the worked answer

Comply with the committee's decision and document the gap. Enroll in the approved seminar, but in parallel pursue no-cost substantive learning - extension publications, published water-market studies, and consultation with a qualified water-rights specialist on the engagement team. Disclose in the project report the limits of your water-law expertise and the role of any specialist consulted. The professional obligation is to deliver competent work, which may mean bringing in expertise rather than acquiring it personally within the window. Do not represent the negotiation seminar as qualifying you in water economics.