ASNT NDT Level III PT study materials
ASNT NDT Level III PT study resources

Procedure Qualification for a New Alloy and Geometry

ASNT NDT Level III PT · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Procedure Qualification for a New Alloy and Geometry

A Level III is tasked with qualifying a penetrant testing procedure for a new type of nickel-based superalloy turbine blade with a complex internal cooling circuit and a thermal barrier coating (TBC) on the external surface. The existing procedure was written for stainless steel blades without TBC and uses a post-emulsifiable penetrant with a lipophilic emulsifier. The customer specification requires penetrant testing per ASTM E1417 and mandates that the procedure be qualified per ASTM E1417's requirements for new applications. The Level III must consider the effects of the TBC, the alloy, and the geometry on penetrant testing. The TBC is a ceramic layer that is porous and may absorb penetrant. The internal cooling circuit has small holes (0.5 mm diameter) that may trap penetrant. The alloy is sensitive to halogens, and the penetrant must have low halogen content. The Level III must develop a qualification plan.

1. What are the key technical challenges for penetrant testing this blade, and how should the Level III address them in the qualification plan?

Read the worked answer

Key challenges: (1) The TBC is porous and can absorb penetrant, leading to false indications or entrapment. The procedure must ensure that penetrant does not penetrate the TBC or that it is completely removed. This may require masking the TBC or using a penetrant that is not absorbed. (2) The internal cooling holes (0.5 mm) can trap penetrant, causing false indications during bleed-out. The procedure must include effective rinsing and drying of the internal passages, possibly using forced air or vacuum assistance. (3) The nickel-based alloy may be sensitive to halogens (e.g., sulfur, chlorine) which can cause stress corrosion cracking. The penetrant must be certified to low halogen content (e.g., per ASTM D129 or similar). (4) The geometry may cause uneven developer application. The qualification plan should include: (a) selecting a penetrant with low halogen content and verifying certification. (b) Evaluating the effect of TBC by testing representative specimens with TBC and known defects; if penetrant absorption is an issue, consider masking or using a different technique. (c) Developing a rinse and drying procedure for internal passages, validated with flow tests or borescope inspection. (d) Qualifying the procedure on actual blades with seeded defects or using a statistically valid sample. (e) Performing system performance checks per ASTM E1417. (f) Documenting all parameters and results in a qualification report.

2. What specific tests and acceptance criteria should be included in the procedure qualification?

Read the worked answer

The qualification should include: (1) Penetrant material certification: verify halogen and sulfur content per ASTM D129 or equivalent, with acceptance criteria based on alloy sensitivity (e.g., total halogens < 200 ppm). (2) Sensitivity and reliability tests: use cracked aluminum blocks or other reference standards to compare the new procedure against a baseline; acceptance: detect all cracks that are detected by the baseline. (3) TBC compatibility test: apply penetrant to a TBC-coated specimen with known defects (e.g., EDM notches) and verify that indications are detected without excessive background. Acceptance: no false indications from TBC absorption, and all defects detected. (4) Internal passage cleanliness test: after processing, flush internal passages and analyze for penetrant residue; acceptance: no detectable fluorescence in flush fluid. (5) Developer application uniformity: visual inspection of coating on representative blades; acceptance: uniform, thin coating without pooling. (6) System performance check: per ASTM E1417, using a cracked block or test panel; acceptance: indications match reference photograph. (7) Reproducibility: test at least three blades with seeded defects, inspected by two qualified inspectors; acceptance: 100% detection of defects and no false calls. The qualification report must document all test results and be approved by the Level III and customer if required.