ASWB Clinical study materials
ASWB Clinical study resources

The Teen Who Won't Say

ASWB Clinical · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Teen Who Won't Say

You are a school-based clinician. Jordan, age 15, was referred after a teacher saw fresh cuts on their forearm. In the first session Jordan is guarded, answers in monosyllables, and says, 'I'm not telling you anything-you'll just tell my mom and the whole school.' Jordan's parents are recently divorced; Jordan alternates homes weekly and reports the rules are 'totally different' at each. Jordan denies suicidal ideation but will not discuss the cutting. A brief screen is positive for depressed mood over the past month. Jordan has one close friend and plays on the soccer team. The parent who has primary decision-making authority has not yet been contacted about the referral.

1. How should the clinician approach confidentiality and engagement in this first session?

Read the worked answer

Be transparent and give Jordan as much control as is ethically possible.

  • Explain, in developmentally appropriate terms, the limits of confidentiality up front-specifically danger to self or others, abuse/neglect, and the school's information-sharing practices-and be concrete about what would and would not trigger a call home.
  • Distinguish safety disclosures from therapy content. Jordan's fear ('you'll tell my mom and the whole school') is the barrier; naming it directly and clarifying that not everything goes to parents reduces the need to withhold.
  • Do not promise unconditional secrecy-that would be a false promise and would breach trust when broken.
  • Engage via Jordan's strengths (soccer, the close friend) and offer choices (who is told what, pacing) to restore a sense of agency.
  • Assess risk directly even though Jordan deflects: ask about frequency, methods, intent, and function of cutting, and about suicidal ideation with a structured screen. Denial in a guarded first session is not reassurance.

Document the confidentiality discussion and risk assessment.

2. Jordan discloses that the cutting happens 'when the week switches' and that at one home 'nobody notices anything.' How should the clinician formulate the problem and plan?

Read the worked answer

Formulate as non-suicidal self-injury in the context of family transition, inconsistent structure, and perceived invisibility-not simply 'attention-seeking' and not automatically a safety emergency.

  • Function over form: cutting appears tied to the weekly transition and to feeling unseen. That points to intervention targets: predictability, emotional validation, and distress-tolerance skills.
  • Assess both households (with appropriate releases/consent) for supervision, rules, and responsiveness-without framing either parent as the villain.
  • Coordinate with the school (counselor, nurse for wound care) while limiting disclosure to need-to-know.
  • Plan: safety plan, DBT-A or CBT skills for emotion regulation, scheduled check-ins around transition days, and a family conversation about consistent expectations.
  • Re-screen for suicidality at each contact; NSSI and suicide risk overlap but are not identical-document the distinction.

Avoid over-pathologizing and avoid minimizing; both are common errors with adolescent NSSI.

3. Jordan's mother (the decision-making parent) demands to see your session notes and asks what Jordan said. What should you do?

Read the worked answer

Balance parental rights with the adolescent's developing autonomy and clinical judgment.

  • Understand the legal/policy context: the parent generally holds rights to information about a minor's treatment, but clinical judgment and school policy govern how much detail is shared, and many jurisdictions give adolescents some confidential space.
  • Do not hand over verbatim session content reflexively. Share what is necessary for safety and treatment: risk level, the safety plan, what the parent can do, and the treatment plan.
  • Talk with Jordan first about what will be shared, honoring the earlier confidentiality agreement as far as safety allows. If safety requires disclosure (e.g., active risk), disclose what is needed and explain why.
  • Document the request, the rationale for what was and was not shared, and any consultation.

Key principle: parental involvement is generally protective and should be pursued, but 'the parent asked' is not a mandate to disclose every detail; the clinician exercises judgment and transparency.