The Missing Signature
Robert, age 58, is referred by his employer's EAP after a workplace conflict. He reports 3 weeks of low mood, anhedonia, poor concentration, and sleeping 10–11 hours nightly; he has gained 5 pounds and feels 'heavy.' He denies suicidal ideation but says, 'I'd be fine if I just didn't wake up.' He drinks 2–3 beers most nights and has hypertension managed with medication. He has no prior mental health treatment and is skeptical: 'I don't want to be labeled.' He asks whether he has to 'talk about feelings' and whether medication is 'the only way.' He has not yet signed consent for treatment or for release of information to the EAP.
1. What diagnostic considerations are most important here, and what would you do before settling on a diagnosis?
Read the worked answer
Consider major depressive disorder (low mood, anhedonia, hypersomnia, appetite/weight change, concentration problems, ~3 weeks) versus bipolar disorder (screen for past hypomanic/manic episodes-critical before any antidepressant), plus alcohol use and medical contributors (hypothyroidism, sleep apnea, medication effects).
Before diagnosing:
- Screen for mania/hypomania (prior elevated mood, decreased need for sleep, impulsivity).
- Quantify alcohol use (AUDIT-C) and clarify whether drinking is causing or coping with symptoms; consider a brief intervention.
- Coordinate with his physician (with release) to rule out medical causes and review antihypertensives.
- Clarify the passive death wish ('didn't wake up') with a structured suicide risk assessment-passive ideation still warrants a safety plan and follow-up.
- Note that a 3-week course may not yet meet full duration criteria; consider unspecified or other specified depressive disorder and reassess.
Document the differential and the screening results.
2. Robert refuses to sign consent and says he'll 'think about it.' What is the appropriate response?
Read the worked answer
Respect autonomy; do not treat or bill without consent.
- Explain in plain language what consent covers, what information would go to the EAP (and what would not), and his right to refuse or limit the release.
- Separate the two consents: treatment consent and the EAP release are distinct. He can consent to treatment while declining the EAP release, understanding any consequences (e.g., EAP session limits or reporting requirements).
- Offer to answer questions, provide written materials, and set a brief follow-up. Do not pressure or use the passive death wish as leverage to obtain a signature.
- If there is imminent risk, act on safety grounds regardless of consent (emergency evaluation), documenting the rationale. Absent imminent risk, his 'think about it' is a valid choice.
- Document the discussion, his questions, and his decision.
3. Robert later consents to treatment but insists, 'No labels in my record-just say I'm stressed.' How should the clinician handle this?
Read the worked answer
The clinician cannot falsify the clinical record, but can collaborate on how information is framed and shared.
- Explain that the record must accurately reflect assessment and treatment, and that insurers/EAP may require a diagnosis for authorization.
- Reduce stigma through education: a diagnosis is a billing and communication tool, not a judgment about him; many people with depression function well and improve.
- Where lawful and accurate, use the least stigmatizing accurate code (e.g., if criteria are not fully met, an unspecified/other specified code may be appropriate) and write notes that are objective and strengths-inclusive.
- Control downstream disclosure: limit EAP release to the minimum necessary (e.g., attendance and progress, not full notes) if Robert authorizes that scope.
- Do not agree to omit a diagnosis that is required or clinically accurate; do not collude with a misleading record.
Document the conversation and the agreed scope of any release.