Magazine Capacity Before the July 25 Shipment
A licensed explosives dealer's magazine is limited by its license condition to 500 pounds of explosive material stored at any one time. The July log shows: opening balance July 1, 212 lb. On July 6, six cases arrived, each labeled 40 lb. On July 9, one received case was found water-damaged; 15 lb of its contents were removed and destroyed, and the rest of that case stayed in the magazine. On July 18, a customer purchased two 5-lb units taken from the older stock. No other entries appear. A shipment of two more 40-lb cases is scheduled for July 25, and the responsible person must certify the log before accepting it.
1. Treating the July 6 case labels as net explosive weight, compute the current inventory and the remaining capacity.
Read the worked answer
Track every movement in one running figure:
| Event | Change | Balance |
|---|---|---|
| July 1 opening | - | 212 lb |
| July 6 receipt (6 x 40) | +240 | 452 lb |
| July 9 destruction | -15 | 437 lb |
| July 18 sale (2 x 5) | -10 | 427 lb |
Remaining capacity = 500 - 427 = 73 lb.
Note that the destroyed material is removed from the magazine, so it comes off the balance, but the undamaged remainder of that case stays counted. Destroying contents does not retroactively erase the receipt entry.
2. The July 25 shipment is two cases at 40 lb each. Can it be accepted as scheduled? If the labels turn out to be gross weight with 4 lb of packaging per case, does the answer change?
Read the worked answer
As labeled (40 lb net each): 427 + 80 = 507 lb, which exceeds the 500-lb limit by 7 lb. The full shipment cannot be stored. Options: accept one case (467 lb, 33 lb of headroom), accept one full case plus a partial amount up to 33 lb recorded as a partial case, or defer the shipment.
If labels are gross weight: net per case = 40 - 4 = 36 lb, so the July 6 receipt should have been 6 x 36 = 216 lb, not 240 lb.
| Event | Change | Balance |
|---|---|---|
| July 1 opening | - | 212 lb |
| July 6 receipt (6 x 36 net) | +216 | 428 lb |
| July 9 destruction | -15 | 413 lb |
| July 18 sale | -10 | 403 lb |
Remaining capacity = 97 lb, so the 80-lb shipment fits with 17 lb to spare.
The lesson: every quantity on a log must be reduced to the same unit the limit is written in before any addition is performed. Mixing gross and net silently moves the total by 24 lb here - more than three times the margin that decided the question.
3. Regardless of which way the shipment is resolved, what must be captured in the record, and what is the risk of certifying first and reconciling later?
Read the worked answer
Required entries: the July 9 destruction (date, quantity, method, and the person who performed and witnessed it), the July 18 sale, the retained partial case, and the disposition of whatever portion of the July 25 shipment is accepted or refused.
Risk of certifying before reconciling: certification is an attestation that the log is accurate as of signature. If the case labels were gross weight, certifying the 240-lb receipt converts a clerical error into a false certification, and the 507-lb calculation would rest on inflated numbers in either direction. The sequence should be: verify units, correct the receipt entry if needed, recompute the balance, decide the shipment, then certify. A certification signed over an unreconciled entry cannot later be defended as a good-faith mistake.