The Weight-Cut Request Before Weigh-Ins
Derek is an AES working with a 17-year-old high school wrestler, Sam, who competes at 152 lb. Sam currently weighs 160 lb with about 10 days until the qualifying meet. His father tells Derek that Sam has done "water cuts" before and wants Derek to design a plan to drop the weight fast, including training in a sweatsuit and limiting fluids. Sam mentions he has felt dizzy after practice twice this week and that he skipped breakfast three days in a row to "make weight." Derek's program requires parental consent for minors but does not have a specific weight-management policy. Derek knows that rapid dehydration and extreme caloric restriction carry serious health risks for adolescents.
1. Evaluate the father's request. What should Derek agree to, refuse, or redirect, and why?
Read the worked answer
Derek should refuse to design a rapid dehydration or severe restriction plan. The request conflicts with safe practice for an adolescent athlete: deliberate dehydration, sweatsuit training, and fluid limitation can impair thermoregulation, cardiovascular function, and cognition, and the reported dizziness plus skipped meals are warning signs rather than proof that the approach is tolerated.
The fact that Sam has done water cuts before does not make them appropriate; prior tolerance is not evidence of safety, especially in a growing athlete. Derek should redirect toward a sound approach: a gradual, modest reduction over a longer timeline, adequate protein and hydration, and coordination with the family and, ideally, a physician or registered dietitian. If the qualifying weight cannot be reached safely in 10 days, the honest recommendation is to compete at a higher weight class or accept the consequence.
Derek should explain the reasoning to both Sam and his father, document the conversation, and note the dizziness and skipped meals. Because Sam is a minor, Derek should ensure the parent understands the recommendation even if the parent disagrees. Derek's role is to support performance and health, not to execute a plan he believes is unsafe.
2. Sam's father threatens to find another trainer and says Derek is "soft." How should Derek respond professionally, and what should he document?
Read the worked answer
Derek should stay calm and non-defensive, restate his position in terms of Sam's health and performance rather than his own judgment, and make clear what he will and will not do. A workable message: he understands the goal, he will help Sam train and eat well, but he will not design dehydration or starvation tactics, and he recommends medical input given the dizziness.
He should avoid being drawn into an argument about toughness; the issue is risk, not character. Offering a concrete alternative (a safe plan, a dietitian referral, competing at a higher weight) gives the family a path forward. If the father chooses another trainer, Derek should not obstruct that, but he should ensure the family has heard the safety concern.
Documentation should include the request as made, Derek's refusal and rationale, the symptoms Sam reported (dizziness, skipped meals), the referral recommendation, and the father's response. Because a minor is involved and symptoms are present, Derek should also notify his supervisor or the appropriate school/program contact per policy. Clear records protect Sam and demonstrate that Derek acted within professional standards.