The Overtime Squeeze
Mira is a single parent of two children (ages 6 and 11) who works 38 hours a week in aged care. Her roster has just changed so that she now finishes at 7 pm three nights a week, while her children's after-school care closes at 6 pm. Her mother, who used to collect the children, has moved into residential care and can no longer help. Mira earns $1,180 per fortnight after tax. A private after-school nanny would cost $420 per week; her employer offers a salary-sacrificed childcare benefit worth $90 per week but only for centre-based care. Her sister can help on Fridays only. Mira has used 4 of her 10 personal/carer's leave days this year and has no savings. She is sleeping about five hours a night and has begun snapping at her children over small things.
1. Identify the specific resources Mira has and lacks, and explain how the mismatch is affecting her wellbeing.
Read the worked answer
Mira's human resources are her paid work capacity (38 hours), her parenting experience, and her willingness to seek help; her non-human resources are her income ($1,180 per fortnight), her leave balance (6 days remaining), her sister's Friday availability, and the $90 salary-sacrifice benefit. The binding constraint is time, not money: the roster change removes the person who previously bridged the 6–7 pm gap, and the nanny option ($420/week) exceeds what her income can absorb after fixed costs.
This mismatch shows up across SPEECS: physically she is sleeping five hours a night; emotionally she is irritable and snapping; economically she cannot fund the private solution; socially her support network has shrunk with her mother's move. The key judgement is that the resource gap is structural, not motivational - telling Mira to 'manage her time better' ignores that the hours simply do not exist in her day. Naming the gap accurately is what makes the next step (negotiating the roster) rational rather than a personal failing.
2. Recommend and justify an intervention strategy, explaining why it addresses the cause rather than the symptom.
Read the worked answer
A layered strategy is stronger than a single fix. First, negotiate the roster with her employer: propose swapping the three 7 pm finishes for early shifts, citing the employer's own childcare benefit as evidence the organisation values retention. This targets the cause (the 6–7 pm gap) at zero cost and uses an existing workplace resource. Second, formalise the sister's Friday help and ask whether a neighbour or another parent at the centre could cover one other night in a reciprocal arrangement - building social capital rather than buying it. Third, access the $90 benefit for the centre-based care she already uses, freeing that money toward a partial nanny share on one remaining night.
Justification: the symptom is exhaustion and irritability, but the cause is a three-night weekly gap between care closing and her shift ending. Buying a full nanny treats the symptom at unsustainable cost; renegotiating hours and mobilising informal networks remove the gap itself. This also preserves her leave balance as a buffer, which a purely financial fix would not.