The Budget That Wouldn't Balance
Dev and Sam are a couple with a combined after-tax income of $1,650 per week. Their fixed costs are rent $520, groceries $280, utilities $95, transport $140, and insurance $60. They also have a car loan repayment of $180 per week (two years remaining), a credit card balance of $4,200 at 19.9% interest, and a streaming and gym bundle worth $75 per week. Sam's hours were cut from full-time to 0.8, reducing income by $210 per week from next month. They have $600 in savings and want to save $5,000 for a bond on a new rental within 18 months. They argue about money weekly and have stopped discussing it.
1. Assess the couple's financial situation and identify the decisions they actually face.
Read the worked answer
Current weekly surplus before the income cut is $1,650 − ($520 + $280 + $95 + $140 + $60 + $180 + $75) = $300. After Sam's cut, the surplus falls to $90 per week. The savings goal of $5,000 in 18 months requires about $64 per week, which fits within $90 but leaves almost no buffer for emergencies - and they currently hold only $600, roughly one week's fixed costs.
The real decisions are not 'spend less' in the abstract. They are: (1) whether to redirect the $75 discretionary bundle, which alone exceeds the required savings rate; (2) how to treat the $4,200 credit card, where interest is compounding against them; and (3) how to manage the car loan, which is fixed for two more years. The opportunity cost judgement matters here: every week of delay on the credit card costs interest, while every week of delay on savings costs goal progress. The couple's refusal to discuss money is itself a resource problem - communication is a resource they have stopped using, and the weekly arguments are a symptom of an unshared plan, not a spending flaw.
2. Recommend a sequenced plan and justify the order of the steps.
Read the worked answer
Step 1 - Open the conversation with a shared plan, not blame. Agree on a fixed 20-minute weekly money check-in. The arguments suggest decisions are being made reactively; a scheduled review converts conflict into a recurring, bounded task.
Step 2 - Build a small buffer first. Redirect the $75 bundle toward savings until they hold at least $1,000 (about six weeks), then split it. An emergency fund prevents a car repair from going onto the 19.9% card, which would undo the plan.
Step 3 - Attack the credit card. With $90 surplus plus the redirected $75, they can put roughly $150–165 per week at the card and clear $4,200 in about seven to eight months, saving substantial interest. This comes before aggressive goal-saving because the card's interest rate exceeds any return on savings.
Step 4 - Resume the bond goal. After the card is cleared, the full redirected amount plus surplus can rebuild toward $5,000, which remains achievable within 18 months.
Justification: the order follows cost of delay - highest-interest debt first, but only after a buffer exists so the plan is not derailed by one shock. Cutting the bundle is the least painful lever because it is discretionary and its weekly value exceeds the required savings rate.