Choosing the Individual Project
A student, Noor, must choose an Individual Project pathway. Noor is strong in design and has produced excellent costume renderings, but is also a confident writer and has drafted a short script. The school has limited workshop access, and the design pathway requires building a realised costume or set piece, which needs materials and supervised time. Noor has 14 weeks, a budget of about $150, and two after-school sessions per week available for practical work. The script pathway requires a polished draft plus a written reflection but no materials budget. Noor's teacher notes that Noor tends to over-plan and under-produce, and that the assessment rewards a completed, realised product with documented process.
1. What decision-making framework should Noor use to choose between the design and script pathways, and what should the decision turn on?
Read the worked answer
The decision should turn on feasibility and evidence of completed work, not on which skill Noor enjoys most or which looks more impressive.
Framework:
- Map each pathway's requirements against resources. Design needs materials, workshop access, supervised construction time and a realised product. Script needs time, drafting discipline and reflection. Noor has $150, two after-school sessions and 14 weeks.
- Test the constraint that is most likely to fail. For design, the binding constraint is workshop access and construction time, not talent. For script, the binding constraint is Noor's tendency to over-plan and under-produce - a script can be endlessly revised without ever being finished.
- Assess the risk profile of each. Design risks running out of supervised time and producing an unfinished piece, which the criteria punish heavily. Script risks a polished plan with no completed draft, which the same tendency threatens.
- Look for evidence, not intention. Noor already has strong renderings (evidence for design) and a draft script (evidence for script). The question is which pathway Noor can complete given the constraints.
- Decide on the completed-product criterion. Since assessment rewards a realised product with documented process, Noor should choose the pathway where completion is most likely, and build a production schedule with milestones that force production over planning.
Likely conclusion: The script pathway is lower-risk on resources but directly exposed to Noor's over-planning habit; the design pathway is higher-risk on time and materials but plays to demonstrated strength. The decision should be made after checking actual workshop availability and costing the materials against the $150 budget. If workshop access is secure and the build is achievable within budget, design is defensible; if not, script with a hard drafting deadline is the safer choice.
2. Whichever pathway Noor chooses, how should the 14 weeks be structured to counter the over-planning tendency and ensure a realised product?
Read the worked answer
The structure must make production non-negotiable by front-loading decisions and setting hard milestones that cannot be renegotiated.
General principles:
- Set a decision deadline in week 1 and do not reopen it. Over-planners lose time to reconsideration.
- Work backwards from the deadline. Reserve the final two weeks for finishing, documenting and polishing, not for new work.
- Make each week produce something physical. A rendering, a mock-up, a drafted scene - tangible output, not more planning documents.
- Use the two after-school sessions for making, not thinking. Planning happens in short bursts; the sessions are protected production time.
- Keep a process journal with dated entries, because the assessment rewards documented process and the journal also exposes drift early.
If design: Weeks 1–2 finalise the design concept and cost materials against the $150 budget; weeks 3–8 build the realised piece across the two weekly sessions, with a mid-point review at week 8 to check the build is on schedule; weeks 9–11 finish and fit; weeks 12–14 document and prepare the presentation. Book workshop time in week 1 so access is secured.
If script: Weeks 1–2 lock the structure and complete a full draft; weeks 3–6 redraft in focused passes; week 7 table-read with peers; weeks 8–10 revise; weeks 11–14 polish and write the reflection. Set a rule that no scene is rewritten more than twice.
Accountability: A weekly check-in with the teacher against milestones converts the tendency into a managed risk rather than a hidden one.