The 90-Second Monologue: Deciding What to Cut
You have drafted a monologue of about 420 characters on the topic of moving from Osaka to a regional town for university. The task sheet says: speak for 90 seconds, and your draft must convey one clear stance plus one supporting episode. At a practice run you speak at roughly 4.5 characters per second, so your draft runs about 93 seconds - but only because you rush the final two sentences, where your pronunciation of 「地方」 and 「都会」 blurs and your ending trails off. Your teacher's feedback sheet lists three criteria: clarity of stance, coherence of the episode, and natural delivery. You have 20 minutes before the recorded assessment and you cannot lengthen the time limit.
1. Should you cut content, slow down, or keep the draft and fix only the ending? Justify your decision against the three criteria.
Read the worked answer
Decision: cut content, then use the freed time to slow the ending.
Reasoning by criterion:
- Clarity of stance - the stance is already stated once; cutting an example or a repeated adjective does not weaken it, whereas rushing makes the stance harder to hear.
- Coherence of the episode - the supporting episode must stay intact. Cut from the framing material (greetings, hedges like 「ちょっと」, redundant connectives), not from the middle of the story, or the listener loses the causal link.
- Natural delivery - the blurring on 「地方」/「都会」 is a speed symptom, not a content problem. Slowing down requires time you do not have, so you must buy time by deleting roughly 40–50 characters (about 10 seconds at your normal pace).
Practical plan: delete two filler phrases and one repeated sentence (≈45 characters), then rehearse the last two sentences at a deliberate pace twice. Do not simply keep the draft and fix the ending - the rush would persist throughout and the delivery criterion would still fail. Do not slow the whole script without cutting - you would overrun 90 seconds.
2. Write the two-sentence closing you would rehearse, and explain in 2–3 sentences why a slowed, simplified ending scores better than a fast, complex one.
Read the worked answer
Model closing (original): 「結局、私は地方での四年間を、都会に戻るための準備ではなく、自分が何を大切にするかを決める時間にしたいと思っています。だからこそ、この選択を後悔しないように、毎日の小さな決断を大事にしていきます。」
Why this works better slowed: A monologue is judged by a listener who hears it once. A complex ending delivered fast forces the listener to spend attention decoding rather than understanding, and any mispronunciation lands exactly where the marker expects your strongest moment. A simpler ending with clear pauses lets the stance land, and the pause itself signals confidence. Complexity belongs earlier, where a stumble is recoverable; the final ten seconds should be the most controlled part of the performance.