The Radio Interview About Returning Home
You listen to a 4-minute radio interview. A woman named Vesna, who emigrated to Australia in 1998, says: «Кога заминав, мислев дека никогаш нема да се вратам. Но секоја година одам дома - не „дома“ во куќата, туку дома во јазикот. Моите деца зборуваат македонски, но со акцент. Тоа ме боли, ама во исто време ме гордее - зашто тие го избраа јазикот, не им беше наметнат.» The interviewer then asks: «А што е за тебе „дома“ сега?» and Vesna pauses for two seconds before answering: «Дома е таму каде што можам да се изразам без да размислувам.» You must answer comprehension questions based on this extract.
1. Explain what Vesna means by 'дома во јазикот' and how the pause before her final answer functions in the interview.
Read the worked answer
«Дома во јазикот» (home in the language) is a metaphor that relocates belonging from a physical place to a linguistic one. She explicitly distinguishes it from «дома во куќата» (home in the house), so 'home' is not the building she left but the experience of moving comfortably within Macedonian. The metaphor is reinforced by her observation that her children speak Macedonian «со акцент» (with an accent) - an accent marks them as not-quite-native, yet she reframes this as pride because they chose the language («тие го избраа јазикот, не им беше наметнат»). The two-second pause before her final answer is meaningful: it signals that the question required genuine reflection rather than a rehearsed reply, and it foregrounds the definition that follows. In spoken discourse, such a pause often precedes a carefully formulated or emotionally loaded statement; here it marks the shift from anecdote to definition, giving weight to «Дома е таму каде што можам да се изразам без да размислувам» - home is where she can express herself without thinking.
2. Evaluate whether Vesna's final definition of home is consistent with her earlier statements, and identify one tension in her account.
Read the worked answer
The definition is largely consistent: if home is where she can express herself «без да размислувам» (without thinking), then her annual returns are returns to that effortless linguistic space, not to a building - exactly what «дома во јазикот» announced. However, there is a tension. She says her children speak Macedonian with an accent, which implies they do not inhabit the language as effortlessly as she does; their Macedonian requires thought. So her definition of home excludes, at least partially, the very children she is proud of. A second, subtler tension: she claims the children chose the language freely, yet she also says «Тоа ме боли» (it hurts me) about their accent - suggesting she still measures their Macedonian against a native norm. The account is therefore coherent on the surface but contains an unresolved conflict between pride in choice and grief over imperfect inheritance. A strong answer names this conflict explicitly rather than smoothing it over.