The Overheard Voicemail and the Missing Verb
A student listens to a voicemail from a Russian friend, Larisa, in which she says: «Я сегодня не смогу прийти в шесть, потому что задержусь на работе, но давай встретимся завтра в то же время». The student writes in their listening notes: 'Larisa cannot come today at six because she is delayed at work, but suggests meeting tomorrow at the same time.' The teacher asks the student to justify each detail. A classmate claims the 'same time' must mean six o'clock, while another says it is unverifiable. The recording is played only twice, and the student must decide whether their note is a safe inference or an overreach, and how to phrase the answer in English for full marks.
1. Is the student's note a valid summary of the message? Justify each element, including the ambiguity of «в то же время».
Read the worked answer
Yes, the note is fundamentally valid, but one element needs hedging.
- «не смогу прийти в шесть» → cannot come at six today. The negation + future inability + time is explicit; this is safe.
- «потому что задержусь на работе» → because she will be delayed at work. The reflexive perfective «задержусь» signals a future delay; safe.
- «но давай встретимся завтра» → but let's meet tomorrow. «давай + verb» is a suggestion; safe.
- «в то же время» → 'at the same time'. This most naturally refers back to six o'clock, the only time mentioned. However, because no time is restated, a careful answer should say 'at the same time (i.e., six o'clock)' rather than assert it flatly.
Best phrasing: 'Larisa cannot come today at six because she will be delayed at work, and proposes meeting tomorrow at the same time, which most likely means six.' This shows inference, not overreach.
2. The classmate says 'same time' is unverifiable. Write the strongest counter-argument and the strongest concession in 3-4 sentences.
Read the worked answer
Counter-argument: «в то же время» is a cohesive device pointing to the only previously mentioned time, six o'clock; without another time in the message, the default reading is six. Concession: the phrase literally means 'at the same time', and a listener cannot rule out that Larisa and the student share a standing meeting time other than six; the recording alone does not disambiguate. Therefore the answer should present six as the most probable reading while flagging the small residual uncertainty. This balanced phrasing earns the inference mark without losing accuracy.