The Letter That Says Two Things
You read a letter from a cousin, Arjun, who lives abroad. He writes warmly about family, then says: 'I have been thinking about Amma's health. The doctor says the treatment can wait until the new year, but I feel we should not delay. I have spoken to my manager about leave - it is not confirmed. If I come in November, I can stay only ten days, and the festival falls in the middle of that. Please tell me honestly what you think, but do not worry Amma by discussing it with her yet.' The letter closes with an affectionate postscript asking for a recipe. The family must decide whether to ask him to come in November or wait.
1. What is Arjun actually asking, and what constraint does he place on how the family responds?
Read the worked answer
The explicit question: 'Tell me honestly what you think' - about whether he should come in November.
The implicit position: He has already leaned toward coming. He reports the doctor's view that treatment can wait, then immediately counters it with 'I feel we should not delay', and he has already approached his manager. A person who has not decided does not open a leave conversation. So the letter is less a request for an open opinion than an invitation to confirm a decision he has half-made.
The constraint: 'Do not worry Amma by discussing it with her yet.' This is a direct instruction that limits who may be consulted. Any reply must respect it - the family can discuss among themselves but cannot raise it with the mother.
The judgement: A reply that treats the question as fully open ('do whatever you think best') ignores the signals. A reply that simply says 'yes, come' ignores the unconfirmed leave. The strongest response acknowledges his leaning, addresses the leave uncertainty, and honours the confidentiality instruction. Note also that the warm tone and the recipe postscript are not decoration - they signal the relationship is close enough for frankness.
2. List the practical constraints his visit would face and explain how each affects the advice you would give.
Read the worked answer
Constraint 1 - Unconfirmed leave. He says the leave 'is not confirmed'. Any plan built on November assumes approval that does not yet exist. Advice should therefore be conditional: 'come if leave is approved by [date]'.
Constraint 2 - Ten-day limit. A short stay means scheduling matters. Travel days consume part of it, so effective time is under ten days.
Constraint 3 - The festival falls mid-visit. This is an opportunity and a complication: the family will be busy with festival obligations precisely when they might want quiet time with him, and the mother's routine may be disrupted. It also means the visit coincides with a period when the health issue is harder to keep discreet.
Constraint 4 - Medical timing. Treatment can wait until the new year, so a November visit is not medically urgent. The case for November rests on family presence, not on clinical need.
Constraint 5 - Secrecy from the mother. A visit itself may prompt questions, so the family must plan how to explain his arrival without revealing the discussion.
Advice: Support the visit only if leave is confirmed early enough to book travel, and plan the festival days so the mother is not overburdened.