Two Readings of a Short Story Ending
You are analysing a 600-word short story in which a daughter visits her father's empty house after his death. The final line is: 'She locked the door and posted the key back through the letterbox.' Earlier, the story mentions that the father always lost his keys and once climbed in through a window. A classmate argues the ending shows the daughter 'being careless', because posting a key inside a locked house is illogical. Your task is to analyse how the ending shapes meaning, using evidence from the whole text.
1. Evaluate the classmate's reading and offer a stronger interpretation supported by the earlier detail.
Read the worked answer
The classmate treats the line as a realistic action and finds a logical error, but the earlier detail about the father losing keys and climbing through a window signals that keys carry meaning in this story. Posting the key back through the letterbox repeats his habit and suggests she is leaving the house in his care, or symbolically joining him in a gesture of return. The apparent illogicality is the point: the action is symbolic rather than practical. The judgement call is choosing the interpretive frame the text invites, since reading every sentence as literal realism would make the ending a mistake rather than a designed choice.
2. Explain how the final line's position and brevity contribute to its effect.
Read the worked answer
As the last sentence, it is the reader's final impression, so it carries disproportionate weight; nothing follows to explain or soften it. Its brevity, two short clauses joined by 'and', gives it a flat, deliberate calm that contrasts with the emotional subject of a father's death. That restraint invites the reader to supply the feeling rather than being told it. If the sentence were longer and more explicit, the ambiguity that makes the ending interesting would disappear. The judgement call is connecting form to meaning, not just identifying a short sentence.
3. A second reader says the ending proves the daughter felt nothing. Assess this claim.
Read the worked answer
The claim overreads the evidence. The action shows what she does, not what she feels, and narrative restraint is not the same as emotional emptiness. The return of the key can be read as attachment as easily as detachment, and the story gives no interior statement either way. A defensible answer distinguishes what is stated from what is inferred and acknowledges that more than one inference fits. The judgement call is that strong analysis can hold ambiguity rather than forcing a single emotional conclusion, and examiners reward evidence-based uncertainty over confident overstatement.