Whose Story Is Being Told?
A student responds to a non-literary text: a 2019 travel magazine feature about a remote coastal community, written by an outsider journalist. The feature describes the villagers as 'timeless', 'smiling' and 'untouched by modernity', quotes one local shopkeeper, and includes six photographs of fishermen at dawn. The assessment asks students to analyse how context and perspective shape representation. The student's draft argues the article is 'biased' and should have included more local voices. The teacher comments that 'biased' is a blunt judgement and that the student has not considered the magazine's context or audience.
1. Explain how the article's context and intended audience shape its representation of the community.
Read the worked answer
The text is a travel magazine feature, a commercial genre whose purpose is to make a destination desirable to readers who are likely urban, leisured and distant. That context explains the selection of dawn photographs and the vocabulary of timelessness: the community is rendered as scenery and atmosphere rather than as a working society.
Representation is therefore shaped by the implied reader's expectations. 'Untouched by modernity' flatters the reader's search for authenticity while implicitly positioning the villagers outside contemporary life. The single shopkeeper quote functions as a token of access, giving the impression of local voice without distributing narrative authority.
This is not simply 'bias' as error; it is a perspective produced by genre, market and audience. Analysing it means naming those pressures, not just noting that a viewpoint exists.
2. The student wants to replace the word 'biased'. Suggest a more analytical framing and explain why it is stronger.
Read the worked answer
A stronger framing is to describe the article as constructing a particular 'gaze' or perspective, then analyse its effects. For instance: 'The feature constructs the community through a tourist gaze that values authenticity while denying change, positioning villagers as objects of the reader's experience rather than agents within it.'
This is stronger because 'biased' implies a correct neutral version exists and that the writer has deviated from it. The analytical framing instead asks what perspective the text inevitably offers, how genre and audience produce it, and what that perspective makes visible or invisible. It also invites evidence: the adjectives, the photo selection, the single quote.
The student can still critique the representation, but the critique becomes grounded in how meaning is made rather than in an accusation about the writer's fairness.