Der Anrufbeantworter: ein innerer Monolog in 110 Wörtern
Creative-response task: write a 110-word inner monologue in German from the perspective of the daughter in this answerphone message. The message: „Ja, hallo, hier ist Papa. Ich weiß, du wolltest nicht ans Telefon kommen. Also … Oma ist gestern ins Krankenhaus gekommen. Nichts Dramatisches, sagen sie. Aber ich fahre heute Abend hin. Wenn du mitwillst, hol ich dich um sechs ab. Tschüs.“ No further context is given. The class has identified three traps: over-explaining, contradicting the text, and writing a speech rather than a thought. The marking criteria reward „a plausible voice grounded in the text“. The monologue must be in German and must not introduce a second speaker.
1. What does the message permit the writer to invent, and what must it forbid? Justify the boundary.
Read the worked answer
Permitted:
- That the daughter has been avoiding calls - licensed directly by „du wolltest nicht ans Telefon kommen“.
- Her reaction to „nichts Dramatisches“, including suspicion of the vague „sagen sie“.
- Small concrete detail: the kitchen clock, the phone in her hand, the coat by the door.
Forbidden:
- Naming a diagnosis. The text explicitly withholds it, and naming it converts an open situation into a closed one.
- Killing Oma off, or having her already recovered. Both contradict the timeline (she went in yesterday).
- Deciding whether the father is reliable. The monologue can wonder; it cannot rule.
- Inventing a mother, a siblings' quarrel or a backstory - 110 words cannot carry it, and it would displace the actual tension.
The principle: invent what the text implies and leaves blank; never invent what the text has decided. The gap between „nichts Dramatisches“ and a hospital admission is the whole dramatic engine - filling it kills the story.
2. What register and tense choices would you make for 110 words, and how would you use the detail „um sechs“?
Read the worked answer
- Register: colloquial standard German, short paratactic sentences, no subordinate-clause chains. A person thinking does not speak in a Satzgefüge. One or two particles („ja“, „doch“, „halt“) do more for voice than any amount of slang, and slang risks sounding like a costume.
- Tense: present for the moment of listening, which creates immediacy - „Ich stehe in der Küche und höre seine Stimme zweimal.“ Perfekt or Präteritum for one memory that explains the silence. Mixing them deliberately is the point: present for now, past for why.
- „um sechs“: use it once, as pressure, not as plot. It is the only concrete number in the message, so it should land: „Um sechs. In zwei Stunden.“ Repeating it destroys the effect.
- Length discipline: 110 words allows one image, not a backstory. Choose the phone, or the coat, not both.
- Avoid the speech trap: no rhetorical questions to an audience, no „Was soll ich nur tun?“ - that is a monologue on stage, not a thought.
3. Draft the line that does the most work in your monologue and explain why it earns its place.
Read the worked answer
Model line: „Um sechs, sagt er, so wie früher, wenn er uns sonntags abgeholt hat, und ich höre mich schon ‚ja‘ sagen, bevor ich es gedacht habe.“
- It grounds the voice in the text: „um sechs“ comes straight from the message; nothing is imported.
- It shows the rift without stating it. The sentence never says „wir haben uns entfremdet“, which would be over-explaining. Instead the father's phrase triggers a childhood memory, and the reader infers the distance from the fact that the same words now sound different.
- It leaves the decision open. „bevor ich es gedacht habe“ suggests her answer is forming without her consent - which respects the ambiguity of the prompt and gives the closing line something to resist.
- Syntax does the emotional work: the long „so wie früher, wenn …“ delays the main clause, so the memory literally holds up the sentence, the way it holds up her reply.
- Economy: one memory, one verb of speech, one involuntary „ja“. In 110 words that is a full paragraph's worth of characterisation.