Reading a Persuasive Opinion Piece on Tourism
For a reading task you are given a short opinion column from an Indonesian regional newspaper. The writer argues that a new resort development on a nearby island will bring jobs and should proceed. The column opens with a story about a local fisherman whose income has fallen, uses the phrase demi kesejahteraan masyarakat, cites 'data dari pemerintah daerah' without a figure, and closes by asking readers to support the project. It never mentions the reef, although an earlier paragraph briefly notes that the fisherman now travels further to fish. You must write a response analysing the text's argument, not simply summarising it.
1. Identify the persuasive techniques in the column and explain how each works on the reader.
Read the worked answer
Four techniques stand out. (1) Anecdotal opening - the fisherman personalises an abstract economic claim, inviting empathy before any evidence is weighed; a single case feels representative even when it is not. (2) Appeal to collective welfare - demi kesejahteraan masyarakat frames the project as altruistic, making opposition seem selfish. This is an appeal to values rather than evidence. (3) Unsupported authority - 'data dari pemerintah daerah' borrows credibility from an institution while supplying no number, date or source, so the claim cannot be checked. (4) Direct call to action - the closing request to support the project positions the reader as a decision-maker and forecloses debate. The most revealing detail is the buried clue: the fisherman travelling further to fish hints at depleted local waters, plausibly linked to the reef the column omits. A strong analysis notes that omission is itself a rhetorical choice - what is left out shapes the argument as much as what is included.
2. Write the opening two or three sentences of your analytical response in Indonesian, then explain in English why you chose that framing.
Read the worked answer
A defensible opening: Tulisan ini membangun argumennya terutama melalui kisah pribadi dan seruan moral, bukan melalui data yang dapat diverifikasi. Meskipun menyebut 'data dari pemerintah daerah', penulis tidak mencantumkan angka apa pun, sehingga pembaca diminta percaya pada otoritas alih-alih menilai bukti. Yang paling mencolok justru apa yang tidak dibahas: dampak terhadap terumbu karang. The framing is analytical because it names the mechanism (anecdote plus moral appeal), evaluates the evidence (an assertion of data without content), and identifies the omission. It avoids mere summary ('the article says tourism is good') and avoids personal attack on the writer. Using meskipun and justru signals contrast and emphasis, which is the register expected in an analytical response. The final clause sets up the body of the essay. Note that quoting the Indonesian phrase in quotation marks is appropriate; translating it in the analysis would weaken the textual focus.