The Overheard Number in a Market Scene
A Year 12 student listens once to a recorded dialogue set in a Busan fish market. A vendor says, "이거 두 개에 만 원이에요. 세 개 사시면 천 원 깎아 드려요." The student's notes read: "2 for 10,000 won; 3 for 1,000 won discount." Later the buyer asks, "그럼 네 개는 얼마예요?" and the vendor replies, "네 개는 만 팔천 원인데, 오늘은 만 칠천 원에 드릴게요." The student must answer a multiple-choice question asking the total the buyer pays if she buys four items and also a question about the vendor's attitude. The recording plays twice total. The student has 40 seconds between plays to finalise notes and cannot pause.
1. Diagnose the error in the student's first note and explain the listening strategy that would prevent it.
Read the worked answer
The note "3 for 1,000 won discount" mis-parses the phrase 천 원 깎아 드려요. The student has attached the discount to the wrong base price and possibly misheard 천 as the total. The correct reading is: the unit price is 5,000 won each (두 개에 만 원), and buying three earns a 1,000 won reduction, so three cost 14,000 won. The error is not vocabulary but number-chunking under time pressure. A stronger strategy: during the first play, record only raw numbers and their attached nouns (두 개–만 원, 세 개–천 원 깎아), not computed totals. Compute during the 40-second gap. This separates transcription from arithmetic, so a single misheard syllable does not corrupt the whole answer. Students should also note the counter 개 separately from currency 원, since Korean number phrases stack counter, quantity, and price in a fixed order.
2. The buyer ends up paying for four items. Using the second utterance, state the price and justify why the first discount is irrelevant.
Read the worked answer
The buyer pays 17,000 won. The vendor's second utterance sets a fresh price for a different quantity: 네 개는 만 팔천 원인데, 오늘은 만 칠천 원에 드릴게요 - "four would be 18,000, but today I'll give them to you for 17,000." The three-item discount (천 원 깎아 드려요) applies only to a purchase of three; it is a quantity-specific offer, not a standing rate. A common trap is to add the 1,000 won discount to the four-item base of 18,000, which coincidentally also yields 17,000 - so the number is right but the reasoning is wrong. In a written justification, the student should cite the vendor's explicit 네 개는 as the marker that a new price band has opened. The phrase 오늘은 also signals a temporary condition, which matters for the follow-up question on attitude: the vendor is being generous but framing it as a one-day favour, not a permanent price cut.
3. A question asks about the vendor's attitude. Which evidence in the transcript supports "friendly but businesslike" rather than "eager to please at any cost"?
Read the worked answer
Three features support the judgement. First, the vendor volunteers a discount without being asked (세 개 사시면 천 원 깎아 드려요), which signals warmth and sales initiative. Second, the discount is bounded and conditional - it applies to a stated quantity, and the four-item price is still quoted as a real figure (만 팔천 원) before being reduced. A vendor desperate to please would not name the full price first. Third, the framing 오늘은 드릴게요 marks the concession as limited in time, protecting the vendor's margin. Together these show a seller who is personable and proactive but keeps control of the transaction. Students should avoid reading 깎아 드려요 as servility: the honorific 드리다 here is routine service politeness, not deference. The strongest answers quote the co-occurrence of a firm base price with a voluntary, time-limited reduction.