Register choice in a bilingual notice to parents
A Colombo school with a mixed parent body drafts a notice about a changed school pickup time. The principal wants one Sinhala version for all parents. The draft reads mostly in formal written Sinhala (අකාරාදී ලිපි style), but the office clerk has inserted two sentences in colloquial spoken Sinhala, including the phrase for 'come early', because those were quicker to type. The notice will be printed on paper and also sent as a message on a phone app. Some parents are second-language Sinhala readers; others are fluent native speakers. The principal asks you to review the draft before distribution and to explain your choices, noting that the tone must stay respectful but clear, and that the message must not sound like a circular from a government office.
1. Identify the register problem in the draft and recommend how the mixed sentences should be handled, with reasons tied to audience and medium.
Read the worked answer
The draft mixes two registers: formal written Sinhala suited to an official circular, and colloquial spoken forms that belong to conversation. Mixing them mid-text reads as careless rather than friendly, because the shift is unmotivated.
Recommendation:
- Choose one dominant register: a plain, polite written Sinhala that is formal enough to be respectful but avoids heavy official phrasing.
- Rewrite the two colloquial sentences into that register, keeping the meaning ('please arrive early') but using standard written vocabulary and polite verb endings.
- Keep sentences short because the notice is read on a phone screen as well as on paper; long official constructions are harder to scan on a small screen.
Justification: second-language readers benefit from consistent, standard forms; fluent readers find inconsistency jarring. Consistency of register signals respect and care, which matches the principal's stated aim.
2. The principal suggests adding an English translation 'just in case'. Evaluate this proposal.
Read the worked answer
This is a judgement call, not a rule. Points to weigh:
For: some parents may read English more comfortably; a translation reduces miscommunication about a time change, which has practical consequences.
Against: the principal asked for one Sinhala version; adding English may signal that Sinhala is secondary, which can offend fluent speakers. It also doubles length on a phone screen.
Balanced answer: if a translation is added, it should be presented as an equal parallel version, clearly labelled, not as a gloss on the Sinhala. Better still, keep the Sinhala notice as the primary text and offer the English version as a separate attachment or link so neither is framed as a correction of the other. The decision should follow the school's language policy and the actual literacy profile of parents, which the draft does not establish.