SACE Stage 2 Agricultural Production study materials
SACE Stage 2 Agricultural Production study resources

Post-Harvest Grain Storage and Aeration

SACE Stage 2 Agricultural Production · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Post-Harvest Grain Storage and Aeration

A grower harvests 800 t of wheat at 13.5% moisture and stores it in a 1,000 t silo. Two weeks later, a probe near the silo wall reads 15.8% moisture and 31 °C grain temperature, and a musty smell is detected at the surface. Ambient conditions over the coming week are forecast at 20–24 °C with 65–75% relative humidity. The grower has an aeration fan rated at 15,000 m³/h and a grain cooler available for hire. The grain is contracted for delivery in six weeks at a moisture spec of 12.5%.

1. Diagnose what is happening in the silo and explain why the localised moisture and temperature readings matter.

Read the worked answer

Diagnosis: The average harvest moisture (13.5%) masks a localised wet spot near the wall at 15.8%. This is consistent with moisture migration: warm grain in the centre drives moisture to cooler zones near the wall, where it condenses. The 31 °C temperature and musty smell indicate biological activity - likely mould growth and possibly heating - already underway.

Why localised readings matter:

  • Mould risk: Above roughly 14–14.5% moisture, mould growth accelerates; at 15.8% and 31 °C the conditions favour rapid deterioration, mycotoxin risk, and loss of germination and milling quality.
  • Heating: Biological activity generates heat, which drives further moisture migration - a self-reinforcing cycle that can lead to a hot spot and, in severe cases, spontaneous combustion risk.
  • Averages hide problems: A silo average of 13.5% can look acceptable while a small wet pocket spoils a large tonnage, and the smell confirms the problem is real, not a probe error.

Judgement: This is an urgent problem, not a routine one. The grain cannot simply be left for six weeks; intervention is needed now to arrest deterioration and meet the 12.5% delivery spec.

2. Recommend an intervention strategy using the available equipment, and justify why ambient aeration alone may be insufficient.

Read the worked answer

Why ambient aeration alone is insufficient: Ambient air at 20–24 °C and 65–75% RH has a high equilibrium moisture content - blowing it through wet grain may add moisture rather than remove it, especially at the wall. Aeration can cool grain but will not reliably dry a 15.8% pocket under these conditions.

Recommended strategy:

  1. Core the silo - remove grain from the centre to break up the mass and allow the wet pocket to mix and equalise; this also lets the affected grain be inspected and segregated.
  2. Hire the grain cooler - cooling the grain to below ~20 °C slows mould and insect activity immediately, buying time regardless of ambient humidity.
  3. Aerate only when conditions allow - run the fan when ambient air has a lower equilibrium moisture content than the grain (typically cooler, drier nights), and monitor grain temperature and moisture during and after.
  4. Segregate and test - keep the suspect grain separate, test for moisture and mycotoxins, and plan to dry it (or blend only if permitted) to meet the 12.5% spec.
  5. Clean and monitor - remove surface residue and re-probe weekly.

Justification: The plan addresses the cause (localised wet, warm grain) rather than just the symptom, uses the cooler to arrest biology when ambient air is unsuitable, and protects the delivery contract by ensuring the grain is dried and tested before it leaves the farm.