Editing a Bilingual Poster Under a Deadline
A youth group has 48 hours to print 300 posters for a language-revitalisation evening. The poster has a Hakha headline, an English subtitle, and a Hakha paragraph of about 90 words. The printer charges per revision, so only one more round of edits is affordable. Three problems have surfaced: the Hakha headline uses a spelling that older readers accept but younger readers find unfamiliar; the English subtitle promises 'free dinner', which the budget cannot cover; and the Hakha paragraph contains one sentence that two reviewers say is grammatically doubtful. The group must decide what to change, what to leave, and how to justify the choices to both older and younger community members.
1. Rank the three problems by risk and justify the ranking.
Read the worked answer
1. The false 'free dinner' promise. This is the highest risk because it is a factual error that will cause real disappointment and damage trust on the night; it must be fixed in the single revision. 2. The doubtful sentence. Medium risk: a grammar error is visible to fluent readers and undermines credibility, but it does not mislead about facts. It should be fixed if a confident correction can be agreed quickly; if reviewers disagree and time is short, replace the sentence with a simpler one everyone accepts. 3. The headline spelling. Lowest risk: both spellings are readable, and the disagreement is about familiarity, not meaning. Changing it may please one group and annoy the other, so it is the safest thing to leave as is.
2. Explain how the group should communicate the spelling decision to both groups.
Read the worked answer
The group should present the decision as consistency, not preference. Explain that with one revision left, changing the spelling would require re-checking the whole paragraph, which risks new errors, so the current spelling stays for this print run. Acknowledge both views openly: older readers find it familiar, younger readers find it less so. Offer a concrete follow-up, such as a short glossary post explaining the spelling variation, or adopting the other spelling for the next event after consultation. This avoids framing either generation as wrong and turns a disagreement into a shared language question. The key is to name the constraint (time, cost) as the reason, so no group feels overruled on identity grounds.