Reading a Council Notice for a Complaint Letter
Students must write a formal letter of complaint to their local council about a cancelled bus route. The stimulus is a two-paragraph council notice. Paragraph one states that Route 14 will be 'suspended pending review' from 3 March because of 'low patronage and driver shortages.' Paragraph two says residents may 'make representations in writing within 21 days' and that 'interim arrangements will be communicated separately.' A student, Hana, plans to write that the council has 'admitted the route was well used' and that 'no alternative transport has been provided.' She also wants to demand that the council 'reverse the decision immediately' and to send the letter on 30 March.
1. Evaluate Hana's two factual claims against the notice, and explain the consequence for her letter's credibility.
Read the worked answer
Claim 1 - 'admitted the route was well used': not supported. The notice cites low patronage as a reason for suspension. That is the opposite of the claim. If Hana writes this, a reader who checks the notice will see a direct contradiction, and the whole letter becomes suspect.
Claim 2 - 'no alternative transport has been provided': only partly supported. The notice says interim arrangements will be communicated separately. That tells us arrangements are planned but not yet announced; it does not establish that none exist. Hana can accurately write that no interim arrangements have yet been communicated to residents, which is a fair inference from the text and still supports her complaint.
Consequence: a complaint letter's persuasive force rests on accurate quotation. One demonstrably false claim invites the council to dismiss the rest. Hana should quote the notice's own words where possible, and distinguish what the notice says from what she infers. Her strongest accurate point is the gap between the suspension date and the silence on alternatives.
2. Hana intends to send the letter on 30 March. What is the problem, and what should she do instead?
Read the worked answer
Problem: the notice allows 21 days to make written representations. Counting from 3 March, the window closes around 24 March. A letter dated 30 March is late, and the council can set it aside as out of time regardless of how well argued it is. Hana appears to have confused the suspension date with the deadline for representations.
What she should do:
- Recalculate and state the deadline explicitly in her letter - for example, 'I write within the 21-day period provided by your notice of 3 March' - so the reader can see she is in time.
- Send before the deadline, keeping a dated copy as evidence.
- Separate her requests. 'Reverse the decision immediately' ignores the notice's own framing ('suspended pending review') and is unlikely to be granted. A more effective request is to ask what evidence the review will consider, when interim arrangements will be announced, and how residents can contribute - requests the council can actually answer.
- If she genuinely cannot meet the deadline, she should say so and ask for an extension rather than pretend the date is irrelevant.